Archive · 13 Sep 2026
UP Official Challenges Quashing of Student’s NSA Detention
A Delhi University student named Akriti Chaudhary joined a protest supporting workers in Noida.
The district magistrate ordered that she be held under a national-security law.
The Allahabad High Court cancelled that detention order.
It said there was not enough evidence that the student had caused violence or threatened public order.
The court also said officials had relied too much on guesses and opinions.
It ordered Rs 5 lakh to be paid to Chaudhary.
The money may be recovered from the salaries of officials found responsible.
Now the district magistrate has asked the Supreme Court to consider the case.
The High Court said people can peacefully gather and speak up for causes without being treated as threats.
Gautam Budh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam has approached the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court’s decision to quash Akriti Chaudhary’s NSA detention.
The 25-year-old Delhi University student was detained over a workers’ protest in Noida.
The High Court ordered Rs 5 lakh compensation, to be recovered from officials’ salaries, including Roopam’s.
The court said the detention order relied on repetitive and speculative opinions without supporting evidence of violence or threats to public order.
The ruling affirmed that peaceful gatherings and public agitation are protected by freedom of speech and expression.
- Who
- Gautam Budh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam and Delhi University student Akriti Chaudhary are central to the case.
- What
- Roopam has challenged the Allahabad High Court’s quashing of Chaudhary’s detention under the National Security Act.
- When
- The Allahabad High Court issued its ruling on September 2; the date of the Supreme Court challenge is not stated.
- Where
- The detention concerned a workers’ protest in Noida, Uttar Pradesh; the challenge is before the Supreme Court.
- Why
- The High Court found insufficient evidence of violence or a threat to public order and said Chaudhary’s constitutional rights had been violated.
Allahabad High Court’s Findings
District Magistrate’s Challenge
Validity of the detention
Allahabad High Court’s Findings
The High Court quashed the NSA detention, saying it was based on assumptions and lacked material showing that Chaudhary would disrupt public order or threaten national security.
District Magistrate’s Challenge
The district magistrate has approached the Supreme Court seeking to challenge the High Court’s decision.
Officials’ conduct
Allahabad High Court’s Findings
The High Court criticized the district magistrate’s handling of the case, called the exercise of authority casual and cavalier, and ordered compensation recoverable from responsible officials.
District Magistrate’s Challenge
The article does not state the district magistrate’s arguments against the criticism or the compensation order.
Public protest and free speech
Allahabad High Court’s Findings
The High Court said peaceful, unarmed gatherings and public agitation are protected forms of expression and should not be restricted based only on an assumed breach of peace.
District Magistrate’s Challenge
The article does not provide the state’s specific position on whether the protest posed a public-order risk.
- Detained person
- Akriti Chaudhary, a 25-year-old Delhi University student
- Detention law
- National Security Act
- Protest
- A workers’ protest in Noida
- High Court action
- Quashed the detention order
- Compensation
- Rs 5 lakh
- Potential recovery
- The compensation was ordered to be recovered from the salaries of responsible officials, including the district magistrate and officials down to the station house officer
- High Court’s finding
- The detention grounds were repetitive, speculative and unsupported by evidence showing a threat to public order