Archive · 19 Sep 2025
Supreme Court: Touching a Child's Private Parts Not Rape
The Supreme Court made a decision about a case where someone touched a child's private parts.
The court decided that this action is not considered rape, but a different crime called 'outraging modesty'.
This means the punishment is less severe.
The court examined the law and the evidence in the case, including what the child and her mother said, and found that there was no sexual assault.
The person involved, Laxman Jangde, had their prison sentence reduced because of this ruling.
The Supreme Court reclassified touching a child's private parts as outraging modesty.
The original sentence of 20 years for Laxman Jangde was reduced.
The verdict came after interpreting provisions of the IPC and Pocso Act.
The victim in the case was 12 years old.
The court stated the actions did not meet the criteria for rape.
- Who
- Supreme Court
- What
- Ruled that touching a child's private parts is outraging modesty, not rape.
- When
- Information not available.
- Where
- India (Supreme Court)
- Why
- To interpret IPC and Pocso provisions regarding sexual offenses.
- Ruling
- Touching private parts is outraging modesty, not rape
- Defendant
- Laxman Jangde
- Original Sentence
- 20 years (reduced)
- New Sentence
- 5 years
- Victim's Age
- 12 years old
- Laws Involved
- IPC and Pocso Act