Archive · 15 Nov 2025
Universities Boycott Global Rankings Over Transparency and Methodology Concerns
Imagine you're trying to pick the best summer camp.
Some people create lists that say which camps are the best, like a 'top camp' chart.
But some camps are saying, 'Hey, these lists aren't fair!'
They worry the lists only look at a few things, like how many popular counselors the camp has, and not enough about fun activities or how much kids learn.
They also say the way the lists are made is a mystery, and they can't check if it's right.
So, some camps are deciding not to be on these lists anymore because they think the lists don't really show how good they are at helping kids grow and learn in many different ways.
They want people to judge them on more than just a few numbers.
Sorbonne University has withdrawn from the Times Higher Education (THE) world university rankings due to concerns about methodology and transparency.
Key criticisms include rankings' opaque methodologies, favoring English-language publications, and reliance on reputational surveys.
Several Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) also previously withdrew from THE rankings over similar transparency issues.
Utrecht University cited concerns that rankings promote competition over collaboration and cannot capture a university's full quality.
Ranking providers like THE state they use a balanced set of indicators and independent data, including academic surveys and citation analysis.
- Who
- Sorbonne University, older IITs (Delhi, Kharagpur, Madras, Kanpur, Bombay, Roorkee), and Utrecht University
- What
- Announced withdrawal or expressed concerns about global higher education rankings, specifically the Times Higher Education (THE) rankings.
- When
- Sorbonne University most recently; IITs in 2020, Utrecht University in 2023.
- Where
- Primarily concerning global university rankings; Sorbonne University is in France, IITs are in India.
- Why
- Concerns regarding lack of transparency, opaque methodologies, bias towards English-language publications, overemphasis on reputational surveys, and data sources used by ranking organizations.
Universities Boycotting Rankings
Rankings Providers
Transparency and Methodology
Universities Boycotting Rankings
Rankings are often 'black boxes' with undisclosed methodologies and data, making them unreproducible and difficult for universities to understand or challenge. They may favor English-language publications and certain disciplines over others, disadvantaging humanities and social sciences.
Rankings Providers
Rankings utilize a broad range of independent data, including extensive academic reputation surveys and citation analyses, to provide a comprehensive assessment. Participation is voluntary, and data submission supports the collaborative nature of the exercise.
Focus on Metrics vs. Holistic Contributions
Universities Boycotting Rankings
Rankings overemphasize quantifiable metrics like reputation surveys and citation counts, potentially encouraging self-citation or prioritizing quantity over quality. They fail to capture the full diversity of institutional activities and contributions.
Rankings Providers
Rankings use 17 balanced and comprehensive performance indicators, including research environment, teaching reputation, and citation impact, to evaluate institutions.
Data Sources and Open Science
Universities Boycotting Rankings
Some rankings rely on subscription-based databases like Scopus or Web of Science, which certain institutions do not use or support. Universities prefer to focus on free and open infrastructures.
Rankings Providers
The rankings incorporate significant amounts of data from various sources, including academic surveys and millions of research publications and citations, to inform their assessments.
- Prominent Ranking Organizations
- QS, Times Higher Education (THE), Shanghai Ranking (Academic Ranking of World Universities)
- QS Ranking Indicators
- Academic reputation (30%), citations per faculty (20%), employer reputation (15%), employment outcomes, faculty-student ratio, international faculty ratio, international research network, international student diversity, international student ratio, sustainability.
- THE Ranking Indicators
- Research environment (around 59% combined with research quality), research reputation (18%), teaching reputation (15%), citation impact (15%), student-staff ratio, research productivity, research influence, patents, international students.
- Shanghai Ranking Indicators
- Quality of research, faculty, and education; Nobel prize and Fields medal winners (20% each for staff/alumni); highly cited researchers (20%).
- Sorbonne University Withdrawal Reason
- Concerns about methodology, focus on English-language journals, reputational surveys, lack of transparency, and THE's reliance on Scopus.
- IITs Withdrawal Reason (2020 onwards)
- Concerns over transparency, unclear metrics, and 'black box' reputation/perception scores with THE rankings.
- Utrecht University Withdrawal Reason (2023)
- Rankings promote stress and competition over collaboration and open science; inability to capture university quality in one number; questionable data and methods.