Archive · 7 Aug 2026
Delhi High Court seeks Election Commission stand on BLA undertaking
When grown-ups want to vote, their names go into a big list called the electoral roll.
Before elections, officials check the list to make sure it is correct.
In Delhi, the list is being updated in a process called a Special Intensive Revision.
The Election Commission told helpers called Booth Level Agents to sign a promise that they personally checked every detail.
A leader named Devender Yadav said this rule is not fair.
He explained that the law only allows government officers to check the list, not private helpers.
He thinks the Election Commission is giving a government job to regular people.
So he went to the Delhi High Court to complain.
The court decided it wants to hear what the Election Commission has to say.
The judge asked the Election Commission for its answer and will discuss the case again on August 12.
The Delhi High Court asked the Election Commission to respond to a plea by DPCC president Devender Yadav over personal undertakings required from booth level agents.
Justice Amit Bansal listed the matter for the next hearing on August 12.
The petition challenges the mandate that booth level agents personally certify verification of all details in enumeration forms during the Special Intensive Revision.
The petitioner argues the undertaking requirement is contrary to Section 23 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and amounts to unlawful delegation of a statutory function to private actors.
The plea also seeks printed and soft copies of electoral rolls, including the 'Frozen Photo Electoral Roll' for Delhi, to help BLAs assist in the revision.
- Who
- Devender Yadav, president of the Delhi Pradesh Congress Committee (DPCC), filed the petition; Justice Amit Bansal of the Delhi High Court is hearing it.
- What
- A plea challenging the requirement that booth level agents give a personal undertaking certifying they personally verified details in electoral roll enumeration forms during the Special Intensive Revision.
- When
- The petition was heard on Friday, August 7; the next hearing is listed for August 12.
- Where
- Delhi High Court, New Delhi.
- Why
- The petitioner says neither the Representation of the People Act nor the Registration of Electors Rules empowers the Election Commission to demand such undertakings, making it an unlawful delegation of a statutory function.
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Judge
- Justice Amit Bansal
- Petitioner
- Devender Yadav, DPCC president
- Issue
- Mandatory personal undertaking by booth level agents during Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
- Next Hearing
- August 12
- Legal Ground
- Section 23, Representation of the People Act, 1950
- Relief Sought
- Set aside SIR guidelines and provide printed and soft copies of electoral rolls for Delhi