Archive · 26 Jul 2025
Mumbai Court Acquits Security Guard in Decades-Old Robbery Case
Imagine a security guard named Ejaz was accused of being part of a robbery that happened a very long time ago, back in 1992.
The police caught him this year, but a court in Mumbai just said he's not guilty.
This is because the people trying to prove he did it, couldn't find any witnesses or show any evidence.
The court explained that it's very difficult to find proof after such a long time, especially in a busy city like Mumbai where people move around a lot.
So, the court had to let him go.
Mumbai Sessions Court acquitted Ejaz Shaikh in a 30-year-old robbery case.
The case originated from a 1992 robbery where a complainant was allegedly attacked and robbed.
Shaikh was arrested in March 2024 after being on the run since 1993.
The prosecution failed to produce any witnesses or evidence in court.
The court cited the long gap and high mobility rate in Mumbai as reasons for lack of evidence.
- Who
- Ejaz Shaikh, a 52-year-old security guard.
- What
- Mumbai Sessions Court acquitted Ejaz Shaikh in a 30-year-old robbery case.
- When
- The incident occurred in 1992 and the acquittal happened recently.
- Where
- Mumbai Sessions Court, Mumbai, India.
- Why
- The prosecution failed to provide evidence or witnesses.
Arguments For Acquittal
Arguments Against Acquittal
Evidence Availability
Arguments For Acquittal
The court decided that the prosecution couldn't provide sufficient evidence or witnesses after such a long period.
Arguments Against Acquittal
The prosecution's likely arguments focused on the original accusations of robbery and the need for justice.
- Accused
- Ejaz Shaikh
- Age
- 52
- Charge
- Robbery
- Year of Incident
- 1992
- Court
- Mumbai Sessions Court
- Reason for Acquittal
- Lack of Evidence
