Archive · 21 Jul 2026
Doctor and Hospital Liable for Rs 5 Lakh in Hysterectomy Negligence Case
A woman in Tamil Nadu, India, underwent a hysterectomy at Rajam Nursing Home.
After the surgery, she experienced severe complications, including a ureter injury and a fistula, which required multiple additional surgeries.
She alleged that the doctor and hospital were negligent in their care.
The hospital and doctor denied these allegations, stating that the complications were known risks and that the patient did not follow up with recommended treatments.
The Tamil Nadu District Consumer Commission ruled in favor of the woman, ordering the doctor and hospital to pay Rs 5 lakh in compensation for her suffering and legal costs.
The commission affirmed that doctors and hospitals can be held accountable for surgical injuries, even if complications are labeled as known risks.
A woman underwent a hysterectomy at Rajam Nursing Home in Tamil Nadu, India, on November 8, 2022.
She suffered a ureter injury and subsequent fistula, requiring multiple additional surgeries.
The woman alleged medical negligence and deficiency in service by the doctor and hospital.
The hospital and doctor denied negligence, stating the complications were known risks and the patient did not comply with follow-up treatment.
The Tamil Nadu District Consumer Commission ordered the doctor and hospital to pay Rs 5 lakh in compensation and Rs 25,000 in litigation costs.
- Who
- A woman who underwent a hysterectomy at Rajam Nursing Home and the doctor and hospital involved.
- What
- The woman suffered a ureter injury and subsequent fistula due to alleged medical negligence during the hysterectomy.
- When
- The surgery was performed on November 8, 2022, and the order was issued on June 25.
- Where
- The incident occurred at Rajam Nursing Home in Tamil Nadu, India.
- Why
- The woman filed a complaint alleging medical negligence and deficiency in service, leading to the compensation order.
Complainant's Perspective
Hospital and Doctor's Defense
Negligence in Surgery
Complainant's Perspective
The complainant alleges that the doctor negligently performed the hysterectomy, causing a ureter injury and subsequent fistula.
Hospital and Doctor's Defense
The hospital and doctor deny negligence, stating that the complications were known risks and the patient did not comply with follow-up treatment.
Informed Consent
Complainant's Perspective
The complainant claims that the doctor did not properly inform her of the risks and complications.
Hospital and Doctor's Defense
The hospital and doctor argue that the complainant and her husband signed consent forms in Tamil and English, understanding the possible complications.
Liability for Medical Negligence
Complainant's Perspective
The complainant holds the doctor and hospital responsible for the medical negligence and deficiency in service.
Hospital and Doctor's Defense
The hospital argues that it did not personally treat the complainant and therefore cannot be held liable.
- Complainant's Surgery Date
- November 8, 2022
- Compensation Awarded
- Rs 5 lakh
- Litigation Costs
- Rs 25,000
- Date of Order
- June 25
- Hospital Name
- Rajam Nursing Home
- Diagnosed Condition
- Right distal ureteric injury and vesico-vaginal fistula
- Husband's Passing
- March 14, 2023
- Fistula Repair Surgery
- March 23, 2023