Archive · 13 Nov 2025
Employee’s Forced Resignation Leads to 70% Salary Hike
Imagine you have a job where your boss and you don't always agree.
Sometimes, you even disagree in front of other people.
Your boss might get upset about this, even if you don't think they would.
Then, your boss tells you that your work isn't good enough, even though they never told you this before or gave you a plan to fix it.
They say you have to leave right away!
This might seem like bad news, but for this person, it turned out to be great.
They got to take some time off to look for a new job.
While looking, they found a much better job that paid way more money and made them very happy.
An employee claims he was forced to resign from his Junior QA role after nearly three years due to disagreements with his manager, despite no prior performance warnings or PIP.
The manager and director cited the employee's performance as 'not up to the mark' as the reason for his immediate departure.
The employee viewed the forced resignation as an opportunity to take time off and prepare for interviews.
Within weeks, the employee received multiple job offers, including one with a 70% salary increase.
The incident has sparked online discussions about workplace politics and hidden career opportunities.
- Who
- A Reddit user, formerly a Junior QA
- What
- Was compelled to resign from his job due to alleged performance issues, which he claims were unaddressed by formal warnings or a PIP. This led him to seek new employment and secure a position with a significantly higher salary.
- When
- Recently, after nearly three years of employment, with the job search and new offers materializing within weeks of his departure.
- Where
- At a company where he worked for nearly three years, leading to his exit and subsequent job search.
- Why
- The employee claims he was forced to resign due to personal disagreements with his manager and an unsubstantiated performance critique. He viewed the resignation as an opportunity to find a better-paying job, which he successfully did.
Employee's Perspective
Manager's Implicit Perspective
Reason for Departure
Employee's Perspective
The employee was forced to resign due to irreconcilable differences with his manager, who took disagreements personally. The manager and director cited performance issues without prior warning or a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
Manager's Implicit Perspective
The manager and director believed the employee's performance was 'not up to the mark,' necessitating an immediate departure, though the specific performance issues and reasons for not issuing a PIP are not detailed from their viewpoint.
Outcome of Departure
Employee's Perspective
The forced resignation provided an unexpected opportunity for the employee to take two months off, prepare for interviews, and ultimately secure multiple job offers with a 70% salary increase.
Manager's Implicit Perspective
The manager and director likely intended for the employee's departure to resolve performance concerns, without anticipating the positive career advancement the employee would achieve elsewhere.
- Employee's Previous Role
- Junior QA handling automation for a module with four applications
- Duration of Employment
- Nearly three years
- Key Disagreement
- Manager took disagreements in meetings personally
- Reason Given for Exit
- Performance 'not up to the mark'
- Prior Warning/PIP
- None
- Employee's Outcome
- Secured multiple job offers with a 70% salary hike
- Time for Job Search
- Two months free time
