Archive · 19 Aug 2026
Bhopal Couple Discover Fake Divorce Four Years Later
A couple in Bhopal thought they had gotten divorced.
Someone claiming to be a lawyer gave them a document saying their marriage had ended.
They paid the person a large fee.
The couple did not know that only a family court can issue a real divorce decree.
They learned four years later that the document was fake.
This means the law still considers them married.
The husband then asked the court to restore their marital relationship.
The case shows why people need to check legal documents carefully.
A Bhopal couple believed they had legally divorced after receiving a document from someone claiming to be a lawyer.
The couple married in 2022, but the woman left two days later alleging that her husband was impotent.
Both spouses paid a substantial fee for the formal-looking divorce document.
They discovered four years later that only a family court can legally dissolve a marriage.
The husband has filed a petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights after learning the marriage remains legally valid.
- Who
- A science postgraduate woman, her businessman husband, and a person claiming to be a lawyer are involved; counsellor Shail Awasthi is handling the case.
- What
- The couple discovered that a document they believed was a divorce decree was fake and that their marriage remains legally valid.
- When
- The couple married in 2022 and discovered the false paperwork four years later.
- Where
- Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, at the District Family Court.
- Why
- They were misled by a person claiming to be a lawyer and were unfamiliar with the requirement that a family court issue the divorce decree.
- Location
- Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
- Marriage
- The couple married in 2022.
- Initial separation
- The woman left her matrimonial home two days after the wedding.
- Allegation
- She alleged that her husband was impotent.
- Fraudulent document
- A person claiming to be a lawyer gave them a formal-looking document declaring the marriage dissolved.
- Discovery
- The couple learned four years later that the document had no legal validity.
- Legal action
- The husband filed a petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights.
- Case observation
- Counsellor Shail Awasthi said the case highlights a gap in legal literacy.