2 hrs ago
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Plea Over Woman’s Deportation
The Supreme Court will examine a complaint about a woman who was taken from India to Bangladesh.
Her son says she is an Indian resident from West Bengal, not an illegal Bangladeshi national.
He says officials detained her in Mumbai and did not give her a proper chance to prove her identity.
He also says she was held for more than 100 hours without being brought before a magistrate.
The petition claims she was then handed to the Border Security Force and pushed across the border.
The court has asked the central government to respond within four weeks.
The son wants the woman brought back to India.
He is also asking the court to examine whether current deportation rules violate constitutional protections.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a son’s plea alleging that his mother was illegally deported from India to Bangladesh.
A three-judge bench issued notice to the Centre and sought its response within four weeks.
The plea says the woman is a permanent resident of West Bengal and cites electoral and identity records supporting her Indian connection.
It alleges she was detained in Mumbai, denied safeguards, and pushed into Bangladesh without a judicial nationality determination.
The petition also challenges the May 2, 2025 deportation procedure and the Immigration and Foreigners Order, 2025.
- Who
- Sahin Akhtar filed the plea concerning his mother; the respondents include the Centre and other authorities.
- What
- The Supreme Court agreed to hear allegations that the woman was unlawfully detained and deported to Bangladesh, along with a challenge to related deportation rules.
- Where
- The woman was allegedly intercepted in Mumbai and later pushed across an international border into Bangladesh; she is described as a resident of Gobindapur in West Bengal.
- When
- The report is dated September 17; the plea says the woman was intercepted on July 19, 2026, and cites a deportation procedure dated May 2, 2025.
- Why
- The petitioner alleges that authorities removed her without a fair nationality inquiry, judicial determination, consular verification, or an effective opportunity to contest the allegations.
Petitioner’s allegations
Authorities’ response pending
Woman’s nationality and deportation
Petitioner’s allegations
The petitioner says the woman is lawfully connected to India, was not an illegal entrant, and was wrongfully pushed into Bangladesh.
Authorities’ response pending
The Centre and other authorities have been asked to respond; the article does not provide their account or a court finding on her nationality.
Procedural safeguards
Petitioner’s allegations
The plea alleges that she was detained without a fair inquiry, access to legal representation, communication with family, or a judicial determination before removal.
Authorities’ response pending
The government’s position on the alleged detention and deportation procedures has not yet been reported.
Deportation rules
Petitioner’s allegations
The petitioner argues that the 2025 deportation procedure and Immigration and Foreigners Order permit removals without safeguards required by law and the Constitution.
Authorities’ response pending
The validity of the challenged provisions remains before the Supreme Court, and no final ruling is reported.
Key facts
- Court action
- The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and requested a response within four weeks.
- Bench
- Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana heard the matter.
- Petitioner
- Sahin Akhtar, represented by senior advocate S Muralidhar and advocate Prasanna S.
- Residence claimed
- Gobindapur, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal.
- Records cited
- The plea cites her grandfather’s name in the 1952 electoral roll and her parents’ names in the 2002 electoral roll.
- Detention allegation
- The plea says she was held for more than 100 hours without being produced before a judicial magistrate.
- Rules challenged
- The petition challenges the Standard Operating Procedure dated May 2, 2025, and the Immigration and Foreigners Order, 2025.
Quotes
The petition filed by Sahin Akhtar
Legal pleading submitted on behalf of Sahin Akhtar concerning his mother’s alleged deportation
“She is a permanent resident of Gobindapur, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal. Her Indian identity and longstanding connection with West Bengal are supported by her identity and civil documents and by historical electoral records. The name of her grandfather, Badsa Gazi, appears in the electoral roll of 1952, while the names of her parents appear in the 2002 electoral roll.”
theprint.in
“On July 19, 2026, she was intercepted in Mumbai by persons identifying themselves as police personnel, forcibly apprehended and taken to a detention facility. Her identity documents and mobile phone were taken from her. No fair inquiry into her nationality was undertaken and she was not afforded an effective opportunity to establish her Indian citizenship.”
theprint.in
Sources
Related news
Supreme Court Closes Citizenship Deportation Case After Returns
Jalil Akhtar Released After Detention Over Citizenship Suspicion
Indian Citizenship Dispute Leaves 66-Year-Old Man in Custody
Gauhati High Court Orders Assam Compensation for Deportation
Bengal Man Granted Bail After 87 Days Over Citizenship Doubt
Indian Man Suspected as Bangladeshi Released After Three Months
Pakistan Inflation Hits World’s Fastest Acceleration Amid Economic Pressure
Opinion Warns of Hindu Persecution and Historical Amnesia
Gulf Crisis Drives Power, Gas Shortages Across Pakistan, Bangladesh
Rainout Rule Could Send India Into Asian Games Semifinals
