11 months ago

Repatriation of Cham Statues Raises Complex Cultural and Political Questions

Repatriation of Cham Statues Raises Complex Cultural and Political Questions
How returning stolen artifacts can distort history rather than serve cultural justice · scroll.in

Imagine old statues from a kingdom that existed a long time ago.

These statues were in a museum in Australia, but they were returned to Cambodia.

However, the kingdom's borders don't match today's countries.

Some people question whether returning the statues is truly fair, because the group that now has the statues might have been involved in taking them in the first place.

The history of these statues includes times of conflict, where statues were stolen by bad groups of people.

Now, it's about deciding who gets to say what's important and whether giving back the statues makes up for what happened.

Key facts

Artifacts
Three Buddhist bodhisattva statues
Origin
Champa Kingdom (2nd-19th centuries)
Former Location
National Gallery of Australia
Repatriated To
Kingdom of Cambodia (2023)
Looting
1990s, involving Cambodian military and former Khmer Rouge soldiers
Original Article
The Conversation

Quotes

Cheunboran Chanborey

Cambodian Ambassador to Australia

“Indeed, putting looted artefacts to their countries of origin can have significant and positive impacts on local communities and their involvement in preserving their cultural heritage.”
scroll.in
“It can foster a sense of pride, national identity and cultural continuity as artefacts hold immense value for the communities to which they belong.”
scroll.in

NGA

National Gallery of Australia

“While the works were almost certainly created in Vietnam […] the archaeological site where they were found is in Cambodia.”
scroll.in

Sources

Related news