Archive · 21 Sep 2026
Chhattisgarh High Court Rejects Husband’s Plea for Marriage Restoration
A husband asked the court to order his wife to return home.
The wife said she had been hurt, threatened, and pressured for a more expensive car and money.
She also said her husband kept important documents such as her Aadhaar card and certificates.
The husband denied the accusations and said he had tried many times to bring her back.
The court said those attempts alone did not prove that the wife had no good reason to stay with her parents.
It considered the claims of mistreatment, dowry demands, a miscarriage, and domestic violence proceedings.
It also said keeping her documents was an important part of the situation.
The court therefore rejected the husband’s appeal.
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a husband’s appeal seeking to bring his wife back home.
The court said visits to her parents’ house and a legal notice did not prove she lacked a valid reason to live separately.
The wife alleged assault, dowry demands including a Creta car and Rs 5 lakh, and harassment by her husband and his family.
The court considered her allegations, miscarriage-related circumstances, complaints, domestic violence proceedings, and withheld personal documents.
The court upheld the family court’s November 2023 rejection of the husband’s plea to resume marital cohabitation.
- Who
- A 26-year-old husband and his 22-year-old wife; the appeal was heard by Justices Parth Prateem Sahu and Sachin Singh Rajput.
- What
- The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the husband’s request to restore marital cohabitation and upheld the family court’s decision.
- When
- The high court heard the appeal on September 18; the family court’s challenged order was issued in November 2023.
- Where
- The case was heard in the Chhattisgarh High Court.
- Why
- The court found that the husband did not prove the wife had left without reasonable cause, citing allegations of mistreatment, dowry demands, related proceedings, and withheld documents.
Husband’s Position
Wife’s Position
Reason for separation
Husband’s Position
The husband argued that the wife had no valid reason to remain at her parents’ home and said he repeatedly tried to bring her back.
Wife’s Position
The wife said continuous ill-treatment, physical assault, threats, and dowry demands forced her to live separately.
Alleged abuse and dowry demands
Husband’s Position
The husband said the allegations of dowry demands, assault, and harassment were false, unsupported, and raised as an afterthought.
Wife’s Position
The wife alleged that her husband and his relatives demanded a Creta car and Rs 5 lakh, and that she was beaten and mistreated.
Efforts to restore the marriage
Husband’s Position
The husband said his visits, legal notice, and willingness to fulfill marital obligations showed that he wanted to resume married life.
Wife’s Position
The wife maintained that these later efforts did not erase the circumstances that gave her a reasonable cause to stay away.
- Marriage
- The couple married in February 2022.
- Ages
- The husband was 26 and the wife was 22 when the appeal was filed.
- Dowry allegations
- The wife alleged demands for a Creta car and Rs 5 lakh in cash.
- Withheld documents
- She alleged that the husband kept her educational certificates, Aadhaar card, caste certificate, and bank passbook.
- Earlier ruling
- The family court rejected the husband’s application in November 2023.
- High court outcome
- The appeal was dismissed and the family court’s order was upheld.