1 hr ago
Nana Patekar Case Ends Without Ruling on Allegations
Tanushree Dutta said Nana Patekar behaved improperly toward her while they were making a film in 2008.
Patekar denied doing what she described.
Dutta spoke about the incident again in 2018, when many people were discussing workplace harassment through the #MeToo movement.
Police investigated her complaint but said they found too little evidence to support it.
Dutta disagreed with how the investigation was handled.
In 2025, a magistrate court closed the complaint because it was filed too late under the relevant time limit, and no request to excuse the delay had been made.
The court did not decide whether the alleged incident happened.
Tanushree Dutta alleged Nana Patekar sexually harassed her during a 2008 song shoot for Horn ‘Ok’ Pleassss; Patekar denied the allegations.
Dutta brought the allegations back into public discussion in 2018 amid India’s #MeToo movement.
In October 2018, Dutta complained to Mumbai Police; an FIR was registered against Patekar and others under IPC sections 354 and 509.
Mumbai Police filed a B-summary report in June 2019, citing insufficient evidence; Dutta disputed the investigation and said she would oppose the report.
In March 2025, an Andheri magistrate court disposed of Dutta’s complaint because the delay exceeded the limitation period and no delay-condonation application had been filed; it did not rule on the allegations’ truth.
- Who
- Actress Tanushree Dutta accused actor Nana Patekar; Patekar denied the allegations.
- What
- A complaint about alleged sexual harassment was investigated and later disposed of on limitation grounds, without a ruling on its factual merits.
- Where
- The alleged incident occurred on the set of Horn ‘Ok’ Pleassss; the complaint was handled by Mumbai Police and an Andheri magistrate court.
- When
- The alleged incident was in 2008; Dutta spoke publicly in 2018, police filed a report in June 2019, and the court disposed of the complaint in March 2025.
- Why
- The magistrate said the complaint was outside the applicable limitation period and Dutta had not applied for condonation of the delay.
Dutta’s position
Patekar’s position and authorities’ findings
Alleged conduct
Dutta’s position
Dutta alleged that Patekar touched her inappropriately and insisted on an intimate dance step during the 2008 shoot.
Patekar’s position and authorities’ findings
Patekar denied the allegations and said they were untrue.
Police investigation
Dutta’s position
Dutta disputed the investigation, saying some witnesses were not heard and alleging witnesses had been intimidated.
Patekar’s position and authorities’ findings
Police said they found insufficient evidence to substantiate the complaint and filed a B-summary report.
2025 court action
Dutta’s position
The complaint was disposed of without a decision on whether the alleged incident occurred.
Patekar’s position and authorities’ findings
The magistrate said the court could not take cognisance because the limitation period had passed and no delay-condonation application was filed.
Key facts
- Film
- Horn ‘Ok’ Pleassss
- Alleged incident
- 2008, during a song shoot
- Public allegations resurfaced
- 2018, amid India’s #MeToo movement
- FIR
- Registered in October 2018 under IPC sections 354 and 509
- Police report
- A B-summary report filed in June 2019, citing insufficient evidence
- Court action
- Andheri magistrate court disposed of the complaint in March 2025 on limitation grounds
- Merits
- The court did not decide whether the allegations were true or false
Sources
Related news
Tanushree Dutta Accuses Neighbours of Harassment, Seeks Investigation
Rohit Pawar Questions Police Delay, Attacks MPSC Government
Marathi Actress Kalyani Nandkishor Reports Attack Near Pune
Actor Nana Patekar Dies at 75 After Cardiac Arrest
Madras High Court Keeps Granite Baron Case With SIT
Former Thane Mayor Denies Links to Purnekar Murder Investigation
Muzammil Ibrahim Recalls Nana Patekar’s Confidence-Building Support
