Archive · 23 Sep 2025
Supreme Court Denies Jacqueline Fernandez Appeal in Money Laundering Case
The Supreme Court decided not to change the money laundering case against actress Jacqueline Fernandez.
The case involves claims that she received gifts from Sukesh Chandrasekhar, who is accused of fraud.
Her lawyer said she didn't know about Chandrasekhar's alleged crimes.
The court allowed her to withdraw her appeal but stated the trial court should not be influenced by the Supreme Court's observations.
Supreme Court refused to quash money-laundering case against Jacqueline Fernandez.
Case involves allegations of receiving gifts from Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
Fernandez appealed against a Bombay High Court order.
Her lawyer argued she was falsely implicated.
The court allowed her to withdraw the appeal.
- Who
- Supreme Court
- What
- Refused to quash money laundering case against Jacqueline Fernandez
- When
- Monday
- Where
- Supreme Court
- Why
- To review a Bombay High Court order.
Jacqueline Fernandez
The Court
Knowledge of Activities
Jacqueline Fernandez
Claims to have a mere acquaintance, unaware of any criminal activities.
The Court
Refused to delve into the merits, implying that issues ought to be argued before the trial court.
- Defendant
- Jacqueline Fernandez
- Case
- Money Laundering
- Amount
- ₹200 crore
- Involved Person
- Sukesh Chandrasekhar
- Court Decision
- Refused to interfere
Sources
Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain Actor Jacqueline Fernandez's Plea Against High Court Order
No SC lifeline for Jacqueline in money-laundering case
SC rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea in ₹200 crore money laundering case
Important cases heard by Supreme Court on Monday
Supreme Court Denies Relief to Jacqueline Fernandez
