Archive · 5 Sep 2026
Nishu's Counsel Questions One-Day Custody for Accused Swatantra
A lawyer representing Nishu questioned the police custody given to accused Swatantra.
The lawyer said the police asked for only one day of custody.
He called the offence serious and wanted more information.
He said he had not been told what new charges were added.
He also said he did not know what changes were made to the FIR.
The lawyer wondered whether something was being kept hidden.
He said Delhi Police had not made an official statement about the legal sections.
The article does not provide the police’s response.
Nishu’s counsel questioned why only one day of police custody was sought in what he called a serious offence.
The counsel said he was not given details about charges allegedly added to the case.
He also said he did not know what additions had been made to the FIR.
The counsel questioned what might be hidden in the case.
He said Delhi Police had not officially disclosed the sections involved.
- Who
- Nishu’s counsel questioned the custody of accused Swatantra.
- What
- The counsel challenged the request for and details surrounding one-day police custody.
- Where
- The matter involves Delhi Police; the specific location is not stated.
- Why
- The counsel said details about added charges, FIR additions, and the applicable sections had not been disclosed.
- Accused
- Swatantra
- Represented party
- Nishu
- Custody sought
- One day of police custody
- Case document
- First Information Report (FIR)
- Counsel’s concern
- The counsel said details of added charges and FIR additions were not provided.
- Police statement
- The counsel said Delhi Police had not officially stated the sections involved.