1 hr ago
Manoj Jha Challenges Nitin Nabin’s Evidence-Free Claims Over SIR
A political disagreement has developed over a review of India’s voter lists called the Special Intensive Revision.
Nitin Nabin of the BJP said opposition parties were confusing people about the review.
Manoj Kumar Jha of the RJD replied that accusations should be supported by proof.
Jha also criticized language surrounding a mosque dispute in Ujjain.
He said such language could divide people by religion.
Jha said the INDIA bloc was still working together even though Akhilesh Yadav did not attend a meeting personally.
Revanth Reddy made comments about how different regions worship different deities.
Those comments led to criticism from the BJP and a response from Jha.
Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Kumar Jha said allegations against the Opposition over the Special Intensive Revision should be supported by evidence.
Bharatiya Janata Party president Nitin Nabin had accused the Opposition of misleading the public and targeting constitutional institutions over the electoral-roll revision.
Jha criticized the handling of the Ujjain Shahi Masjid dispute, warning against what he called dog-whistle politics, othering and demonisation.
Jha said Akhilesh Yadav’s representative attended the INDIA bloc meeting and denied that the absence indicated a rift.
Jha also criticized Revanth Reddy’s remarks contrasting regional religious traditions, while Reddy alleged that the BJP had appropriated Lord Ram and represented wealthy interests.
- Who
- Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Kumar Jha, Bharatiya Janata Party president Nitin Nabin, Revanth Reddy and other political figures.
- What
- A political dispute over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls expanded into disagreements about religious rhetoric, a mosque dispute and INDIA bloc coordination.
- Where
- The comments and political reactions were reported from New Delhi, with references to Ujjain, Telangana and regional religious traditions.
- When
- Jha spoke on Tuesday; Nabin made his allegations on Saturday, and Revanth Reddy made the referenced remarks on Monday.
- Why
- Jha said allegations against the Opposition should be backed by evidence and criticized rhetoric he viewed as divisive.
Opposition and Regional Leaders
BJP and Its Critics
Special Intensive Revision
Opposition and Regional Leaders
Manoj Kumar Jha said the Opposition did not initiate the issue and that findings were presented by The Indian Express with evidence; he demanded evidence for allegations against the Opposition.
BJP and Its Critics
Nitin Nabin accused the Opposition of deliberately misleading the public about the electoral-roll revision and targeting constitutional institutions.
Religious and community rhetoric
Opposition and Regional Leaders
Jha condemned methods he characterized as dog-whistle politics, othering and demonisation, and defended the diversity of regional Hindu traditions.
BJP and Its Critics
The BJP launched a sharp attack on Revanth Reddy after he said the BJP had appropriated Lord Ram, contrasted Shiva worship in the south with Ram worship in the north, and described the BJP as a party of the rich.
INDIA bloc unity
Opposition and Regional Leaders
Jha said Akhilesh Yadav’s representative attended the meeting and that there was no rift on the ground.
BJP and Its Critics
Yadav’s personal absence from the meeting was presented as a point of media and political attention, although no direct opposing explanation from the BJP was provided.
Key facts
- Central issue
- The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
- Jha’s position
- Claims against the Opposition should be supported by evidence
- Nabin’s allegation
- The Opposition was misleading the public and targeting constitutional institutions
- Mosque dispute
- Jha criticized alleged dog-whistle politics and demonisation in connection with the Ujjain Shahi Masjid dispute
- INDIA bloc meeting
- Jha said a representative attended for Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav
- Reddy’s remarks
- He contrasted regional devotion to Shiva and Lord Ram and alleged that the BJP had appropriated Ram
- Political response
- The BJP sharply criticized Reddy’s comments
Quotes
Manoj Kumar Jha
RJD member of Parliament responding to Nitin Nabin’s allegations over the SIR controversy
“The Opposition did not raise the question. The Indian Express investigated it. It presented it with evidence. What should we do after that? I mean, if you want to make allegations against the Opposition as well, then make allegations with evidence. This is not appropriate.”
thehansindia.com
“I say it directly, any such methodology, if it is from the perspective of dog-whistle politics, is not appropriate. What are you doing? You are doing othering; you are doing demonisation.”
thehansindia.com
Sources
Related news
Mohan Yadav Seeks Rahul Gandhi’s Resignation Over SIR Dispute
Nadda Attacks Congress, INDIA Bloc Over Electoral Roll Revision
Opposition Parties Demand CEC Arrest, SIR Rollback and Repolls
Danam Nagender Says SIR Will Not Affect Khairatabad Bypoll
Election Commission Dispute Reignites Major Vote Chori Controversy
Opposition Demands Fresh Polls After Election Commission SIR Row
J&K Assembly Withdraws MLA Pay Bills, Passes Pension Amendment
Pune Road Tender Dispute Escalates After Alleged Threat
Congress Seeks 150 Seats as UP 2027 Strategy Takes Shape
Suvendu Adhikari Attacks Mamata Over Delhi Opposition Meeting