Archive · 7 Oct 2026
Form 6 Dispute Intensifies Scrutiny of India’s Election Commission
Form 6 is a form people use to apply to be added to India’s voter list.
During a voter-list review, an extra declaration was added asking some applicants to connect themselves or relatives to an older voter list.
The Election Commission later removed that extra requirement in places where the review was complete.
The Supreme Court said it had not approved the change and asked to see records explaining who authorized it.
The article says many names were removed from draft voter lists, but removing the extra form requirement does not automatically put those people back on the list.
Some opposition leaders say the process threatens fair elections, while the BJP rejects their accusations.
The article argues that the Election Commission should explain its decisions and make the records clear.
Whether voters who were wrongly left off can be restored is also a concern raised in the article.
The article says an extra declaration was added to online Form 6 during the Special Intensive Revision, asking applicants for details linking them or relatives to an earlier electoral roll.
The Election Commission later removed that declaration in states and Union Territories where the revision had been completed; the Supreme Court said it had not approved the change and sought records about its authorization.
The article reports that more than 13 crore names were deleted from draft rolls across the areas covered, and says removing the declaration does not itself restore deleted names.
It reports that two other Election Commissioners objected to decisions they believed were made without their knowledge, including decisions concerning Form 6 and new voter registration.
Opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, have accused the Commission of undermining electoral integrity and demanded Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation; the BJP rejects the allegations.
- Who
- The Election Commission of India, the Supreme Court, opposition leaders including Rahul Gandhi, and the BJP.
- What
- A dispute over an added declaration in Form 6 during the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
- When
- During the Special Intensive Revision; the article does not give specific dates.
- Where
- The states and Union Territories covered by the revision, with particular scrutiny in West Bengal.
- Why
- The dispute concerns who authorized the extra registration requirement, its legal basis, and whether eligible voters can be excluded or restored.
Opposition and critics
BJP’s response
Electoral integrity
Opposition and critics
Opposition leaders accuse the Election Commission of compromising electoral integrity and have made the Form 6 issue part of a broader campaign against the Commission.
BJP’s response
The BJP rejects the Opposition’s allegations and argues that the Supreme Court has not declared the modified Form 6 illegal.
Meaning of the court’s clarification
Opposition and critics
The article says the court’s statement that it did not approve the modification raises questions about who authorized it and on what legal basis.
BJP’s response
The BJP argues that the court’s clarification is not a finding that the modification was illegal.
- Form involved
- Form 6, used for new voter registration.
- Additional declaration
- Asked applicants whether their own name or a parent’s or grandparent’s name appeared on an earlier SIR electoral roll, with related roll details.
- Court’s position
- The Supreme Court said it had not approved the modified Form 6 and sought records concerning who authorized the change.
- Reported deletions
- More than 13 crore names were deleted from draft electoral rolls across the states and Union Territories covered, according to figures cited in the article.
- Subsequent change
- The Election Commission removed the additional declaration where the SIR had been completed and restored the statutory Form 6.
- West Bengal
- The article says deleted voters there have had to seek restoration through the claims-and-objections process.
- Political response
- Opposition leaders demanded Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation; the BJP rejected the allegations.