Archive · 22 Sep 2025
Scotland Abolishes 'Not Proven' Verdict, Raises Conviction Threshold
Scotland is changing how its juries decide if someone is guilty.
They got rid of a special verdict called 'not proven,' which was like saying 'maybe' instead of 'guilty' or 'not guilty.'
This verdict confused people and sometimes left victims feeling like justice wasn't served.
Now, to find someone guilty, more jurors need to agree.
This is because the government hopes it will lead to more convictions, especially in cases like rape where conviction rates are low.
Some worry that this change could lead to mistakes and that innocent people might be found guilty.
Scotland has abolished the 'not proven' verdict in jury trials.
The change aims to improve conviction rates, especially in rape cases.
Guilty verdicts will now require a two-thirds majority of the jury.
Critics fear the changes could lead to miscarriages of justice.
The 'not proven' verdict has been criticized for causing distress to victims.
- Who
- Scottish Parliament (MSPs)
- What
- Abolished the 'not proven' verdict and changed the majority required for a guilty verdict.
- When
- Not specified in the provided articles.
- Where
- Scotland
- Why
- To address concerns about low conviction rates, especially in rape cases, and the distress caused by the 'not proven' verdict.
Supporters
Critics
Impact on Conviction Rates
Supporters
Removing 'not proven' and raising the bar for guilty verdicts may increase conviction rates, especially for rape.
Critics
Changes may increase the risk of convicting innocent individuals, potentially leading to miscarriages of justice.
Fairness and Justice
Supporters
The changes can improve justice for victims.
Critics
The new system might make the justice system unfair for those accused of crimes.
- Legislation
- Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill
- Verdict Change
- Abolition of 'not proven'
- Jury Decision
- Guilty verdicts require two-thirds majority
- Rape Conviction Rate (2022-23)
- 48%
- Overall Conviction Rate
- 88%