Archive · 12 Oct 2026
Parliamentary Panel Urges Entrance Exam Reforms to Curb Coaching Influence
A parliamentary committee in India has suggested changing some major entrance exams.
It says the tests should check what students understand from their school lessons.
The committee is concerned that some exams reward tricks and repeated practice that coaching centres teach.
It says expensive coaching can give wealthier students an advantage.
The panel also wants rules for coaching centres, including clear fees and safer conditions.
It says students’ mental health should be considered too.
Finally, it wants a national list of examination companies that have been disqualified.
The list could help agencies avoid hiring those companies.
A parliamentary education committee proposed changes to NEET-UG, JEE (Main) and CUET exams.
It wants exam papers to assess conceptual understanding based on official school curricula.
The panel said exams that reward question-pattern familiarity and shortcuts help fuel private coaching.
It called for coaching-industry regulation, including fee transparency, safety standards and attention to students’ mental health.
It recommended a national registry of blacklisted examination vendors to prevent disqualified firms receiving contracts.
- Who
- A 31-member parliamentary standing committee on education, chaired by Congress Rajya Sabha member Mukul Wasnik.
- What
- The committee proposed entrance-exam and coaching-industry reforms and a national registry of blacklisted examination vendors.
- When
- In the committee’s latest report, titled “Reforms and Strengthening of National Testing Agency (NTA)”; no publication date is stated.
- Where
- India.
- Why
- The panel said exams can reward coaching-specific techniques over school-curriculum understanding, and that coaching creates socioeconomic inequality; it also cited the absence of a national registry of blacklisted firms.
Committee’s concerns
Current exam and coaching practices described
What entrance exams should reward
Committee’s concerns
The panel says NEET-UG, JEE (Main) and CUET should assess conceptual understanding based on official school curricula.
Current exam and coaching practices described
The report says exams have often rewarded familiarity with question patterns, shortcuts and repeated practice of past papers.
Role of private coaching
Committee’s concerns
The committee says coaching creates a parallel curriculum and socioeconomic inequality, and calls for a regulatory framework.
Current exam and coaching practices described
The report describes coaching centres as providing intensive drilling suited to the patterns and techniques rewarded by the examination system.
- Committee
- 31-member parliamentary standing committee on education
- Committee chair
- Mukul Wasnik, Congress Rajya Sabha member
- Report
- “Reforms and Strengthening of National Testing Agency (NTA)”
- Exams named
- NEET-UG, JEE (Main) and CUET
- Proposed exam standard
- Test conceptual understanding based on the official school curriculum
- Proposed coaching rules
- Address fee transparency, safety standards and students’ mental health
- Vendor proposal
- Create a national registry recording blacklisted firms, associated individuals, reasons for disqualification and the disqualifying authority