Archive · 19 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Signals Possible CBI Probe Into I-PAC Raid
The Supreme Court is considering whether the Central Bureau of Investigation should examine an incident involving an I-PAC office raid.
The Enforcement Directorate was conducting the raid in January.
Mamata Banerjee was accused of entering the office during the operation.
Her lawyer did not agree that the case should immediately go to the CBI.
The lawyer suggested that the West Bengal government could investigate it instead.
The Enforcement Directorate asked the court for more time to make arguments.
The court therefore postponed the hearing until September 2.
Earlier, the court said that obstructing a central investigation could threaten democracy.
No final decision on a CBI probe has yet been reported.
The Supreme Court indicated it may refer the January I-PAC raid incident to the CBI.
The incident involved an allegation that then chief minister Mamata Banerjee entered the I-PAC office during an Enforcement Directorate raid.
Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta requested further arguments before any CBI referral, saying the Enforcement Directorate and Bengal government wanted to address the case.
The bench postponed the matter until September 2 after Mamata Banerjee’s lawyer sought an adjournment because two other senior lawyers were unavailable.
On April 22, the court said democracy was in peril over alleged obstruction of a central-agency investigation.
- Who
- The Supreme Court, the Enforcement Directorate, Mamata Banerjee, the West Bengal government, and lawyers including Tushar Mehta and Menaka Guruswamy.
- What
- The court is considering a possible CBI probe into Mamata Banerjee’s alleged intervention during an Enforcement Directorate raid at an I-PAC office.
- When
- The incident occurred in January; the matter was heard on Tuesday and postponed until September 2. The court made earlier observations on April 22.
- Where
- At an I-PAC office in West Bengal.
- Why
- The proposed probe concerns an allegation that Mamata Banerjee obstructed a central-agency investigation.
Support for Immediate CBI Referral
Calls for Further Arguments
How the incident should be investigated
Support for Immediate CBI Referral
The court indicated that, after earlier arguments, little remained except referring the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation.
Calls for Further Arguments
Mamata Banerjee’s lawyer suggested that the current West Bengal government could investigate the matter, while the Enforcement Directorate requested further arguments before any referral.
Effect of the change in government
Support for Immediate CBI Referral
The court’s concern focuses on the alleged obstruction of a central-agency investigation by an elected chief minister.
Calls for Further Arguments
The Enforcement Directorate said the case should not appear to be handled differently merely because the government had changed.
- Incident
- Mamata Banerjee allegedly entered an I-PAC office during an Enforcement Directorate raid in January.
- Court
- A bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice N. V. Anjaria heard the matter.
- Possible action
- The Supreme Court indicated that referring the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation may be appropriate.
- Next hearing
- The case was listed for further hearing on September 2.
- Enforcement Directorate position
- Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor-General S. V. Raju sought to present further arguments.
- Earlier observation
- On April 22, the court said democracy was in peril when an elected chief minister obstructed a central-agency investigation.