Archive · 31 Dec 2025
High Court Reduces Punishment for Lost Service Dog Case
A long time ago, a police dog named Laika went missing during a wedding.
The dog's handler, a police officer named Jagmal Singh, was punished for not telling his bosses right away.
The punishment was to lose two pay raises forever.
But recently, a high court said that punishment was too harsh.
They changed it to losing two pay raises, but only for a short time.
The court said Singh made a small mistake, but the punishment didn't fit the mistake.
The court also said that in India, courts have been checking if punishments and laws are fair for a long time.
Service dog Laika went missing during a neighbourhood wedding 25 years ago.
Head Constable Jagmal Singh was punished for not informing his superiors about the dog's disappearance.
The original punishment was the forfeiture of two increments with permanent effect.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court modified the punishment to forfeiture of two increments with temporary effect.
The court observed that the punishment was not proportionate to the minor lapse.
- Who
- Head Constable Jagmal Singh and service dog Laika
- What
- Punjab and Haryana High Court reduced punishment for not informing superiors about the disappearance of a service dog
- When
- The incident occurred 25 years ago, and the court ruling was recent
- Where
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Why
- The court found the original punishment disproportionate to the offence
- Service Dog Name
- Laika
- Head Constable's Name
- Jagmal Singh
- Original Punishment
- Forfeiture of two increments with permanent effect
- Modified Punishment
- Forfeiture of two increments with temporary effect
- Duration of Dog's Disappearance
- About a month
- Year of Incident
- 25 years ago
- Court's Observation
- Punishment not proportionate to the offence
- Advocate for Singh
- Tapan Kumar