Archive · 11 Oct 2026
Matt Renshaw’s 190 Breaks Virat Kohli’s Test Record
Matt Renshaw made a very big score of 190 in a Test cricket innings.
The article says he scored 174 runs while batting with players numbered 8 to 11.
His biggest partnership was with Nathan Lyon, and they added 134 runs together.
Renshaw scored 100 of those runs.
He also batted with Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood.
This was his first Test century in more than nine years.
It was also described as his highest Test score.
The headline says his innings broke a Test record held by Virat Kohli, but the article does not explain the record in more detail.
Matt Renshaw scored 190, described as his highest Test score.
The article says Renshaw contributed 174 runs in partnerships with batters numbered 8 to 11.
He added 100 runs in a 134-run stand with Nathan Lyon.
Renshaw also shared stands of 41 with Pat Cummins, 12 with Mitchell Starc and 21 with Josh Hazlewood.
It was Renshaw’s first Test century in more than nine years; the headline says the innings broke a decade-old Virat Kohli record.
- Who
- Matt Renshaw, with batting partners Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc, Nathan Lyon and Josh Hazlewood; the headline also names Virat Kohli.
- What
- Renshaw scored 190, including 174 runs in partnerships with batters numbered 8 to 11; the headline says he broke a decade-old Test record.
- When
- The article does not specify when the innings took place.
- Where
- The article does not specify where the match took place.
- Why
- The article does not state a reason; it reports Renshaw’s score and partnerships.
- Renshaw’s score
- 190, described as his highest Test score
- Runs in partnerships with batters 8–11
- 174
- Partnership with Nathan Lyon
- 134 runs, with Renshaw contributing 100
- Partnership with Pat Cummins
- 41 runs
- Partnership with Mitchell Starc
- 12 runs
- Partnership with Josh Hazlewood
- 21 runs
- Test centuries
- His first in more than nine years
- Record claim
- The headline says Renshaw broke Virat Kohli’s decade-old Test record; the article does not specify the record