Archive · 16 Sep 2025
Judge Criticizes Deportations to Ghana, Citing Lack of Jurisdiction
A U.S. judge criticized the U.S. government for deporting five migrants to Ghana but said she couldn't intervene.
The judge felt the deportations aimed to bypass U.S. immigration courts.
Ghana agreed to accept the deportees.
The government said the migrants had due process and removal orders.
Some had U.S. legal protections, but Ghana intended to send them to Nigeria and Gambia.
One migrant, who is bisexual, was sent to Gambia and is in hiding.
Judge criticized deportations of West African migrants to Ghana.
Judge said she lacked jurisdiction to hear the case.
Deportations appeared to be an attempt to bypass U.S. immigration courts.
DHS said migrants received due process and had removal orders.
Some migrants had legal protections, but were deported to Ghana.
- Who
- U.S. government, Judge Chutkan
- What
- Judge criticized deportations of migrants to Ghana
- When
- Monday night
- Where
- Ghana, U.S. courts
- Why
- To expedite removals or due to criminal convictions
Advocacy Groups/Judge
DHS/Trump Administration
Legality of Deportations
Advocacy Groups/Judge
Deportations potentially circumvented due process.
DHS/Trump Administration
Deportations were legal and followed due process.
- Countries Involved
- U.S., Ghana, Nigeria, Gambia
- Deportation Target
- Five West African Migrants
- Judge's Ruling
- Lacked jurisdiction but criticized deportations
- DHS Stance
- Migrants received due process and had final removal orders