3 hrs ago
Henna-Applying Machine Sparks Debate Over Jobs and Automation
Harsh Goenka posted a video of a machine seemingly drawing henna on someone’s hand.
He joked that this could mean fewer jobs for people.
The video led many people to discuss whether machines should do work traditionally performed by humans.
Henna artists often create detailed designs at weddings and celebrations.
Some commenters said machines should be used for important tasks, such as highly precise surgery, rather than simple henna application.
Others said human workers may be cheaper than machines in India.
One person worried about what could happen if the machine lost power while working.
Some viewers also thought the video might have been made with artificial intelligence and that the machine may not really exist.
Industrialist Harsh Goenka shared a video appearing to show a machine applying an intricate henna design to a woman’s hand.
Goenka captioned the post, “Some more jobs gone,” prompting debate about technology replacing skilled workers.
Users questioned whether automation should replace henna artists and argued technology should focus on essential tasks instead.
Others noted that machines may be less economical than human workers in India, where labor can be cheaper.
Several viewers disputed the video’s authenticity, suggesting it may be AI-generated rather than showing a real product.
- Who
- Industrialist Harsh Goenka shared the video, while social-media users debated its implications for henna artists and automation.
- What
- A video appeared to show a machine applying an intricate henna design to a woman’s hand with little visible human assistance.
- Where
- The video was shared on X, and the discussion centered partly on work and labor conditions in India.
- When
- Goenka posted the video on September 9, 2026; it had received more than eight lakh views within hours.
- Why
- The post sparked debate about whether machines could replace skilled workers, whether such automation is useful, and whether the video itself is authentic.
Critics of Henna Automation
Supporters of Automation Potential
Effect on workers
Critics of Henna Automation
Replacing henna artists with machines could eliminate work traditionally performed by skilled people.
Supporters of Automation Potential
The video was presented as an example of technology that might automate repetitive or precise tasks, although the article does not identify a confirmed real product.
Whether the technology is necessary
Critics of Henna Automation
Users argued that people can apply henna and that technology should instead address essential tasks such as sanitation, sewer cleaning, river cleaning, or precision surgery.
Supporters of Automation Potential
Others viewed the machine as an example of innovation, while the post’s discussion focused on the possibility that technology could take over more kinds of work.
Authenticity and safety
Critics of Henna Automation
Some viewers said the clip appeared AI-generated and questioned whether the machine exists; another raised concerns about a possible power failure while it was operating.
Supporters of Automation Potential
The video appeared to show a functioning device tracing a design with little visible assistance, though its authenticity was not established in the article.
Key facts
- Video shared by
- Harsh Goenka
- Platform
- X
- Post date
- September 9, 2026
- Claimed activity
- A machine applying henna to a woman’s hand
- Reported reach
- More than eight lakh views within hours
- Main debate
- Automation, employment, and the value of human labor
- Authenticity concern
- Some users claimed the video was AI-generated
Quotes
An unnamed X user
Social-media user responding to Goenka’s post.
“It is waste, technology should be used where it is needed, not for this. People can do this. Surgery by automated high precision machine is fine. Not for this simple application.”
indianexpress.com
“Why no innovation In sanitation work, Sewerage cleaning, dumping grounds, river cleaning…”
indianexpress.com










