Archive · 6 Sep 2026
Courts May Look Beyond Declared Income In Maintenance Cases
A woman asked a court for more monthly support from her husband.
The court kept the payment at ₹1,840 per month.
It said support should consider what the person needs and what the other person can actually afford.
The husband’s income was estimated using Uttar Pradesh’s minimum wage of ₹11,021.
The court also noted that he supported three children.
It found no proof that he owned a medical store or other properties.
Courts may examine a person’s broader finances instead of relying only on salary papers.
People involved in these cases should give complete and truthful information about income, property, debts, and expenses.
A Delhi Sessions Court upheld interim maintenance of ₹1,840 per month under the Domestic Violence Act.
The court said maintenance must reflect both the recipient’s needs and the paying spouse’s ability to pay.
The husband’s income was assessed using Uttar Pradesh’s minimum wage of ₹11,021.
The court found no evidence that the husband owned the claimed medical store or related properties.
Maintenance claims may be pursued under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and Section 20 of the Domestic Violence Act.
- Who
- A woman seeking higher maintenance and her husband, who was ordered to pay interim support.
- What
- The Delhi Sessions Court dismissed the woman’s appeal and upheld maintenance of ₹1,840 per month.
- When
- The order was issued on 1 September 2026.
- Where
- Delhi.
- Why
- The court considered the husband’s assessed income, his support for three children, and his ability to make regular payments, while finding no evidence for the claimed property ownership.
Claimant’s Position
Paying Spouse’s Position
Amount of maintenance
Claimant’s Position
The woman appealed for a higher amount, arguing that the awarded payment did not meet her basic and day-to-day living requirements.
Paying Spouse’s Position
The court held that a person should not be ordered to pay more than their financial means allow, even if the amount awarded is insufficient for the recipient’s expenses.
Financial capacity
Claimant’s Position
The claimant’s needs and the alleged ownership of a medical store and related properties were presented as reasons for seeking greater support.
Paying Spouse’s Position
The court found no evidence supporting the claimed ownership and assessed the husband’s income using Uttar Pradesh’s minimum wage while noting that he supported three children.
Income disclosure
Claimant’s Position
A maintenance claimant may seek relief based on the other spouse’s actual financial circumstances rather than only the income shown in salary documents.
Paying Spouse’s Position
The paying spouse should provide complete and truthful information about income, assets, liabilities, and recurring expenses because underreporting may lead to legal complications.
- Maintenance upheld
- ₹1,840 per month
- Relevant order
- Delhi Sessions Court order dated 1 September 2026
- Income benchmark
- Uttar Pradesh minimum wage of ₹11,021
- Children supported
- Three
- Domestic violence provision
- Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
- Other maintenance provision
- Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
- Central principle
- Maintenance depends on both the recipient’s needs and the payer’s genuine financial capacity