3 weeks ago

Rights body flags judge's egg attack remark on Mahua Moitra

Rights body flags judge's egg attack remark on Mahua Moitra
Human Rights body flags Supreme Court's egg attack remark on MP Mahua Moitra - Telegraph India · telegraphindia.com

A very important politician in India named Mahua Moitra was scared to go to the police station by herself.

Some people had thrown eggs at her before, and she worried it could happen again.

She asked a court if she could talk to the police using a video call instead of going in person.

A big judge called the Supreme Court talked about her request out loud.

A group that protects people's rights thought the judge's words were unkind and unfair.

They wrote a letter saying everyone should be safe, especially women who work in public.

Because of what happened in court, Mahua's lawyer took back her request.

The rights group hopes the court will listen more carefully and treat people with respect.

They said people should not be attacked just for being in the opposition.

Key facts

Petitioner
Mahua Moitra, an Opposition MP
Bench
Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu
Rights body
Bandi Mukti Committee
Committee president
Sujato Bhadra
Petition sought
Permission to appear virtually before police instead of in person
Order challenged
Calcutta High Court order for in-person appearance before police
Outcome
Petition withdrawn after the judge's verbal remarks

Quotes

Bandi Mukti Committee letter to the Bench

Open letter from the Bandi Mukti Committee

““During the hearing, as reported widely in both print and electronic media, an analogy was drawn regarding how the freedom fighters were treated. We do know how they were humiliated, degraded, cruelly treated, tortured to death and shot dead, executed by the colonial state... Here, in the instant case, an organised group of people with visible political inclination... launched a violent attack throwing eggs and other items simply because the petitioner belongs to the Opposition.””
telegraphindia.com
““…as a woman in public life, she deserves specific safeguards against such planned aggressive masculine attacks. Disappointingly, the courts appeared to show acute insensitivity by not paying heed to her legitimate prayer; after hearing these oral hostile observations unexpectedly, the petitioner has had no other alternative but to withdraw her plea for remedy.””
telegraphindia.com

Sources

Related news