Archive · 30 May 2025
India's Supreme Court Reinstates Judicial Practice Requirement
Imagine you want to be a judge!
The Supreme Court decided you need to practice law for at least three years first.
This means you have to work as a lawyer to understand how the court works and how to help people.
Some people think this is a good idea because it helps future judges be better at their job.
Others worry that it might make it harder for some people to become judges.
This also raises the question of whether the new mandate will really improve things or just make it a challenge to join the judiciary.
Supreme Court reinstated a three-year legal practice requirement for entry-level judicial service.
The ruling reverses a 2002 decision that removed the practice requirement.
One perspective is that the practice enhances a candidate’s legal acumen and preparedness.
Another viewpoint is that the practice may not be essential and could deter talented individuals.
Concerns exist about the implementation of the requirement and its potential impact on diversity.
- Who
- The Supreme Court and legal professionals.
- What
- The Supreme Court reinstated a three-year legal practice requirement for entry-level judicial service.
- When
- The ruling was issued in May 2025.
- Where
- India
- Why
- To potentially enhance candidates' legal acumen and preparedness.
Critics' Views
Supporters' Views
Importance of Experience
Critics' Views
Others argue that the practice doesn't significantly enhance legal preparedness.
Supporters' Views
Advocates for the reform believe three years of practice provide valuable courtroom experience.
Impact on Talent
Critics' Views
Opponents think it may deter top talent, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds.
Supporters' Views
Supporters consider it a step in the right direction, though still insufficient.
Implementation Concerns
Critics' Views
Critics highlight that the requirement could become a formality and needs more transparency to assess such experience.
Supporters' Views
Those in favor suggest the experience is important, but acknowledge it needs oversight.
- Date of Ruling
- May 2025
- Court Involved
- Supreme Court
- Practice Mandate
- Three years
- Original Mandate Year
- 1993
- Year Requirement Removed
- 2002