Archive · 11 Sep 2026
Jyoti Mete Questions Jarange Patil’s Mumbai March Over Reservation
Jyoti Mete asked Manoj Jarange Patil why he still planned to march to Mumbai.
She said the government had accepted 12 of his 15 demands.
Mete believes protesters should continue discussions with the government instead of prolonging the hunger strike.
She also asked Jarange to protect his health.
Mete supports the Maratha community’s demand for reservation.
However, she criticized the harsh language used during the protest.
She said her late husband, Vinayak Mete, had fought for this cause since 2014.
She also said a committee had identified more than 58 lakh records connected to the issue.
Shiv Sangram president Jyoti Mete questioned Manoj Jarange Patil’s decision to march toward Mumbai.
Mete said the Maharashtra government had accepted 12 of Jarange’s 15 demands.
She urged Jarange to end his hunger strike and prioritize his health.
Mete said the reservation movement was legitimate but criticized the language used during the agitation.
She said the Shinde Committee identified 58,26,868 records related to the reservation issue.
- Who
- Shiv Sangram president Dr. Jyoti Vinayakrao Mete questioned Maratha quota activist Manoj Jarange Patil’s protest strategy.
- What
- Mete urged Jarange to end his hunger strike and reconsider marching to Mumbai after the government accepted 12 of 15 demands.
- When
- Mete made the remarks at a press conference on Thursday morning.
- Where
- The press conference was held in Beed, Maharashtra; the proposed march was toward Mumbai.
- Why
- Mete said dialogue should continue because the government had accepted most of the demands and had taken legally appropriate steps.
Dialogue and Government Measures
Continued Protest and Mumbai March
Next step in the agitation
Dialogue and Government Measures
Jyoti Mete said protesters should accept the government’s progress, examine the legal aspects and return to dialogue.
Continued Protest and Mumbai March
Manoj Jarange Patil was reported to be insisting on continuing the hunger strike and marching toward Mumbai.
Assessment of government action
Dialogue and Government Measures
Mete said the government’s position was legally sound and that 12 of 15 demands had been accepted.
Continued Protest and Mumbai March
Jarange Patil’s decision to continue the agitation indicates that he does not regard the accepted demands as sufficient to end the protest.
Health and protest language
Dialogue and Government Measures
Mete urged Jarange to protect his health and criticized the declining level of language used during the agitation.
Continued Protest and Mumbai March
The article does not provide Jarange Patil’s response to Mete’s concerns about his health or the language used by protesters.
- Government response
- Mete said the state government accepted 12 of Jarange Patil’s 15 demands.
- Protest action
- Jarange Patil was insisting on marching toward Mumbai while continuing the agitation.
- Mete’s appeal
- She urged him to prioritize his health and end the hunger strike.
- Reservation stance
- Mete called the Maratha reservation demand legitimate and said Shiv Sangram supported it.
- Committee records
- The Shinde Committee identified 58,26,868 records related to the issue, according to Mete.
- Shiv Sangram history
- Mete said her party had fought for Maratha reservation since 2014 under her late husband Vinayak Mete’s leadership.