Archive · 7 Aug 2026
Meta Ordered to Pay $567 Million for Harming Children
A big company called Meta owns apps like Facebook and Instagram that many kids use.
A judge in the state of New Mexico said Meta was not keeping children safe.
The judge said the apps are designed to keep kids using them for very long hours.
This can make children feel stressed, sad, and even sick.
The judge ordered Meta to pay a very large fine of $567 million.
That money will go into a fund to help teenagers with mental health.
Meta also has to make changes, like limiting how long teens can use the apps.
It must stop adults from contacting kids they do not know on the apps.
Other countries and many families are also worried that these apps are unsafe for children.
A New Mexico court ordered Meta to pay $567 million into a Teen Mental Health Fund after finding the company created a public nuisance.
Judge Bryan Biedscheid directed Meta to impose monthly time limits for teen users in New Mexico, restrict notifications, block unknown adults from contacting minors, and add AI chatbot guardrails.
The ruling follows an earlier $375 million jury verdict in the same lawsuit, which found Meta made false and misleading claims about platform safety.
Meta rejected the findings, cited Section 230 immunity and technical difficulties, and announced it will appeal to a higher court.
The European Commission opened a Digital Services Act probe into Facebook and Instagram, while families of four teens who died by suicide sued Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and Alphabet.
- Who
- Meta Platforms (parent of Facebook and Instagram), Judge Bryan Biedscheid, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, and the European Commission.
- What
- Meta was ordered to pay $567 million and overhaul platform features after being held responsible for harming children's health and safety.
- When
- Recent ruling in the second phase of hearings, about five months after the first-phase jury verdict; the four teen deaths occurred between July 2024 and September 2025.
- Where
- Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States.
- Why
- The court found Meta's addictive design features and failure to protect minors from harassment, grooming and exploitation created a public nuisance harming children's mental health.
Child Safety Advocates and Regulators
Meta and the Tech Industry
Public nuisance liability
Child Safety Advocates and Regulators
Meta's platforms harm children's mental health, and the effects spill out of the digital world into the real world, burdening families, schools and hospitals — a public nuisance.
Meta and the Tech Industry
Meta did not directly obstruct any public property like air or water, so the public nuisance claim does not apply.
Blame for teen harm
Child Safety Advocates and Regulators
Meta deliberately designed addictive features and concealed knowledge of harm for profit, making it responsible for the crisis.
Meta and the Tech Industry
Teens also use digital apps from other companies, so blaming Meta alone for the situation is wrong.
Legal immunity and feasibility
Child Safety Advocates and Regulators
Section 230 does not shield Meta because the case targets the company's own features and structure, not third-party content; the ordered safety changes are necessary.
Meta and the Tech Industry
Meta is legally immune under Section 230, and many court-ordered changes are technically impossible or so difficult they could force Meta to exit the state.
- Fine
- $567 million (approx. ₹4,700 crore)
- Beneficiary
- Teen Mental Health Fund
- Prior jury award
- $375 million (first phase, about five months earlier)
- Court
- Santa Fe, New Mexico; Judge Bryan Biedscheid
- Legal finding
- Public nuisance under state law; Section 230 defence rejected
- Decree duration
- Strict decree in effect for five years
- Meta response
- Appeal announced
- EU investigation
- European Commission probe under the Digital Services Act