Archive · 26 Oct 2025
Employee's WFH Request Sparks Tense Exchange with CEO
An employee at a startup sent a message to their CEO to say they would be working from home due to a leg injury.
The CEO responded by criticizing the employee, stating the employee's behavior was not proper.
The CEO said the employee should have requested permission.
The employee explained they were injured and thought informing the CEO was sufficient.
The CEO reiterated that permission, not notification, was required, referencing past incidents regarding holidays as well.
This sparked a discussion on workplace culture and employee-manager communication.
An employee shared a tense exchange with their CEO on Reddit regarding WFH.
The employee informed the CEO they would be working from home due to an injured leg.
The CEO responded with criticism for not asking for permission.
The CEO emphasized the company's culture required permission, not just notification, for WFH.
The Reddit post resonated with users, many sharing similar frustrations with workplace policies.
- Who
- An employee and their CEO.
- What
- Tense exchange over work-from-home policy.
- When
- The timeframe of the exchange is not specified.
- Where
- The employee works at a multinational startup. The location is not specified.
- Why
- The employee informed their CEO about working from home instead of asking permission.
Employee's Perspective
CEO's Perspective
WFH Protocol
Employee's Perspective
Thought informing the CEO was enough given the circumstances.
CEO's Perspective
Required permission and notification not acceptable.
- Employee's Action
- Informed CEO of WFH plans via message.
- CEO's Response
- Criticized employee for improper professional behavior.
- Reason for WFH
- Employee injured leg and had trouble walking.
- Company Type
- Multinational startup.
- Work Culture
- Company culture requires permission, not notification, for WFH.