Archive · 2 Sep 2026
High Court Questions Construction Despite Kaimbwala Land Ban
The Punjab and Haryana High Court is concerned about building work in Kaimbwala village.
The area is described as ecologically fragile.
The court had already banned construction there.
However, a report and video showed many new buildings and boundary walls.
The judges questioned how government authorities allowed this to happen.
The evidence concerned specific land plots listed in official records.
A Local Commissioner submitted the report and video to the court.
The court formally recorded these materials in an August 31 order.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court expressed dismay over construction in Chandigarh’s Kaimbwala village.
The court said construction continued despite a ban imposed by its Division Bench.
A Local Commissioner’s report and video showed numerous constructions and new boundary walls.
The activity was reported on the disputed khasra numbers, or land-record plots.
The Division Bench recorded the report and pen-drive in its August 31 order.
- Who
- The Punjab and Haryana High Court, including Acting Chief Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rohit Kapoor, considered the matter.
- What
- The court questioned why construction continued despite a judicial ban.
- When
- The Division Bench recorded the report and pen-drive in its August 31 order; the article does not specify when the observation was made.
- Where
- Kaimbwala village in Chandigarh, on the khasra numbers under consideration.
- Why
- The court had banned construction in the ecologically fragile area, yet evidence showed that building activity continued.
Court’s Concern
Authorities’ Conduct Under Scrutiny
Construction despite ban
Court’s Concern
The court said it was amazed that construction had continued despite a Division Bench ban.
Authorities’ Conduct Under Scrutiny
The report and video indicated that authorities had allowed construction activity and new boundary walls to proceed.
Condition of the land
Court’s Concern
The court’s intervention concerned construction in an ecologically fragile zone and on the khasra numbers under consideration.
Authorities’ Conduct Under Scrutiny
The article does not provide a response from government authorities or explain why the construction was permitted.
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Location
- Kaimbwala village, Chandigarh
- Environmental status
- The area was described as ecologically fragile.
- Restriction
- A Division Bench of the court had imposed a construction ban.
- Evidence
- A Local Commissioner’s report and a video showed numerous constructions and new boundary walls.
- Order date
- August 31
- Local Commissioner
- Advocate Nitin Kaushal