Archive · 8 Sep 2026
Mumbai Court Rejects Megha Rawal Bail In Bandra Death
A court in Mumbai refused to release Megha Rawal on bail.
The case is about an eight-year-old boy who died after being hit by a car in Bandra.
The accident happened on August 30.
The boy’s family and some witnesses say Rawal was talking on a mobile phone while driving.
Prosecutors say this could show that she knew driving that way might be dangerous.
The boy’s father’s lawyer also said a witness was allegedly threatened.
Rawal’s lawyer said it was an unfortunate accident and that keeping her in prison would serve no purpose.
The court rejected her bail request while the case continues.
A Mumbai sessions court rejected nutritionist Megha Rawal’s bail application on September 7, 2026.
The case concerns the August 30 death of an eight-year-old boy in Bandra.
The boy’s family and eyewitnesses alleged Rawal was using her mobile phone while driving.
The victim’s father’s lawyer raised concerns that witnesses had allegedly been threatened.
Rawal’s lawyer called the incident an accident and challenged the culpable-homicide charge.
- Who
- Nutritionist Megha Rawal, the deceased eight-year-old boy, his family, eyewitnesses, prosecutors, and Rawal’s lawyer are involved.
- What
- A Mumbai sessions court rejected Rawal’s bail plea in the road-accident death case.
- When
- The accident occurred on August 30, and the bail decision was reported on September 7, 2026.
- Where
- The accident took place in Bandra, Mumbai.
- Why
- The court considered allegations about mobile-phone use while driving and concerns that the accused’s family could influence or threaten witnesses.
Defense and Bail Arguments
Prosecution and Victim’s Family
Nature of the incident
Defense and Bail Arguments
Rawal’s lawyer said the incident was an unfortunate accident and argued that Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita was not applicable.
Prosecution and Victim’s Family
The prosecution said eyewitnesses reported that Rawal was using a mobile phone while driving, which allegedly contributed to the crash.
Need for continued custody
Defense and Bail Arguments
The defense argued that keeping Rawal in prison would serve no purpose.
Prosecution and Victim’s Family
The victim’s father’s lawyer opposed bail, citing alleged witness threats and concerns that Rawal’s wealthier family could influence witnesses.
Witness protection
Defense and Bail Arguments
The defense position presented in the article disputes the seriousness of the allegations underlying continued detention.
Prosecution and Victim’s Family
The victim’s father’s lawyer relied on video footage and sought police protection for witnesses.
- Court
- Mumbai sessions court
- Accused
- Nutritionist Megha Rawal
- Victim
- An eight-year-old boy
- Location
- Bandra, Mumbai
- Accident date
- August 30
- Decision date
- September 7, 2026
- Disputed charge
- Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita