11 months ago
DOJ Seeks to Curb Google's Ad Dominance in Court
The U.S. government is trying to make Google change how it sells online ads.
Google runs an ad exchange, where companies buy and sell ad space.
The government says Google has too much control and is asking a judge to make Google sell off its ad exchange.
They also want Google to make it easier for other companies to compete and for advertisers to see how ads are sold.
Google says this will be difficult and hurt its business, arguing that it has been working to make the system better since 2020.
The DOJ wants Google to sell its advertising exchange, AdX, and alter how it does business.
The DOJ argues Google illegally monopolized ad exchange and ad-selling technology.
Google says the government's requests are radical and could damage the technology.
The DOJ also wants Google to give publishers more control over their data and auction processes.
Both sides are presenting expert witnesses and legal arguments in court.
- Who
- The Justice Department (DOJ) and Google
- What
- The DOJ is seeking to force Google to sell part of its business and change its ad practices.
- Where
- Federal Court in Virginia.
- When
- The trial is ongoing, with the DOJ presenting its case and Google preparing its defense.
- Why
- To increase competition in the online display advertising market.
Justice Department
AdX Divestiture
Justice Department
Selling AdX is the single most important way to restore trust for ad buyers.
Divestiture is 'naive, vague, and incoherent,' putting Google at a disadvantage.
Auction Transparency
Justice Department
Making final auction logic public would benefit advertisers and publishers.
Making auction logic public increases the risk of cyberattacks and reveals the 'heart' of the ad server.
Google's Ad Buying Tools
Justice Department
Google's ad buying tools favor its own products, creating a monopolistic issue.
Making Google Ads behave differently would put the company at a competitive disadvantage.
Key facts
- Company
- Google (Alphabet Inc.)
- Legal Venue
- Federal Court in Virginia
- Judge
- Leonie Brinkema
- DOJ's Primary Request
- Divestiture of AdX (Google's ad exchange)
- AdX Market Share
- ~56%
- DOJ Claim
- Google illegally monopolized the ad exchange and ad-selling technology markets
Quotes
Tim Craycroft
Vice president and general manager for Google Advertising
“If the court thinks that’s important we would”
livemint.com
“naive, vague and incoherent in places”
livemint.com
Judge Leonie Brinkema
The federal judge presiding over the case.
“If you had confidence that Google would actually act in complete good faith and follow an injunction, would that then provide that the behavioral remedies would be sufficient?”
livemint.com
“I’m very interested in seeing the evidence of what Google thinks is technically possible.”
livemint.com
Jon Weissman
A computer science expert at the University of Minnesota
“I see no reason why the software would be degraded in any way”
livemint.com
“beautiful to look at”
livemint.com
Jed Dederick
Chief revenue officer at Trade Desk Inc.
“the single most important way to restore the trust of ad buyers”
livemint.com
“lots of advertisers and ad budgets would flow” into the market”
livemint.com
Grant Whitmore
Vice president of ad buying tools at Advance Local
“We don’t know why the impressions land the way they do.”
livemint.com
“It’s like a pachinko ball, we don’t know all the variables that are bouncing the ball around.”
livemint.com
The tech giant disputing the Justice Department's requests.
“radical and reckless”
livemint.com
Paul Crisci
An investment banker
“attractive to a credible and motivated pool of buyers”
livemint.com
Andrew Casale
CEO of Index Exchange
“unshackle the ad server”
livemint.com
Luke Lambert
Works for a division of Omnicom Corp.
“I would be able to understand why I win and why I lose”
livemint.com
Lee
The Justice Department’s economic expert
“incentive and ability”
livemint.com
