Archive · 20 Aug 2026
Hindu College Staff Challenge Admissions After Quota Allocation Error
Hindu College teachers are unhappy about how some special admission seats were distributed.
These seats were meant for students with achievements in sports and extracurricular activities.
In the first admission round, many seats went to Commerce and Political Science.
University rules say one course should not receive more than 20 percent of these seats.
Teachers said this rule was not followed and asked for an investigation.
The University of Delhi said a computer programming mistake caused the problem.
It also said the students who received seats had earned enough points to qualify.
The college principal said she did not directly make the admission decisions.
The staff association responded by passing a no-confidence motion against her.
Hindu College’s staff association passed a no-confidence motion against Principal Anju Srivastava over alleged admission irregularities.
The dispute concerns 32 of 48 ECA and sports quota seats allocated to Commerce and Political Science in the first round.
University of Delhi rules cap allocation to any undergraduate programme at 20% of the combined quota seats.
University officials attributed the over-allocation to an algorithmic error, saying eligible candidates were selected on merit scores.
The staff association sought an inquiry, while the principal said admissions were handled by the university and the college’s admission committee.
- Who
- The Hindu College staff association, Principal Anju Srivastava, and University of Delhi admission officials are involved.
- What
- The staff association passed a no-confidence motion and sought an inquiry over alleged irregularities in ECA and sports quota admissions.
- When
- The first-round allocations were made for the 2026-27 academic session; the emergency staff meeting was held on August 18, a Tuesday.
- Where
- Hindu College, University of Delhi.
- Why
- The dispute arose after 32 of 48 ECA and sports quota seats were allocated to Commerce and Political Science, exceeding the stated programme-level cap.
Staff Association’s Allegations
University and Principal’s Response
Cause of the over-allocation
Staff Association’s Allegations
The staff association alleged procedural violations and said the allocation wrongly favoured popular courses such as Commerce and Political Science.
University and Principal’s Response
University of Delhi said a programming error caused the cap to be applied at the programme level rather than separately to the Sports and ECA quotas.
Responsibility for admissions
Staff Association’s Allegations
Staff Council Secretary Chandrachur Singh alleged that the principal facilitated over-admissions and called for an inquiry.
University and Principal’s Response
Principal Anju Srivastava said admissions were allocated by the university and executed by the college, while the admission committee handled the process and she had no direct role.
Validity of admitted candidates
Staff Association’s Allegations
The staff association argued that the distribution was skewed and that Commerce received more admissions than its sanctioned capacity.
University and Principal’s Response
University officials said there was no merit violation because the candidates qualified through their ECA and sports scores, and the college proceeded after receiving the university’s direction.
- Motion
- Hindu College’s Staff Association passed a no-confidence motion against Principal Anju Srivastava.
- Seats in dispute
- The college had 48 combined ECA and sports quota seats; 32 were allocated to Commerce and Political Science.
- Course allocations
- Commerce received 17 seats and Political Science received 15 seats in the first round.
- Allocation cap
- University rules limit allocation to one undergraduate programme to 20% of the combined ECA and sports quota seats, or 10 seats in this case.
- University explanation
- University of Delhi officials said an algorithmic programming error applied the cap at the wrong level.
- Merit assessment
- The university said the allocated candidates qualified on the basis of their ECA and sports points.
- Requested action
- The staff association sought an inquiry into the alleged procedural violations.