1 hr ago
Delhi High Court Rejects Jiu-Jitsu Athlete’s Asian Games Entry
A jiu-jitsu athlete wanted to compete in the Asian Games.
He asked the Delhi High Court to make authorities send him.
He said he met the eligibility requirements.
The sporting authorities had decided not to send any athlete for jiu-jitsu.
His name was also not submitted before the May 14 deadline.
The court said it cannot make sporting decisions instead of the proper authorities.
The Games had already started in Japan, so the court said it could not provide useful relief.
The Asian Games are scheduled to run from September 19 to October 4.
The Delhi High Court declined to order authorities to send a jiu-jitsu athlete to the Asian Games.
The court said courts cannot replace decisions made by competent sporting authorities about athlete participation.
Authorities had decided not to send any athlete for the jiu-jitsu event.
The athlete’s name was not submitted before the May 14 cutoff date.
Justice Amit Mahajan said no effective relief was possible because the Games were already underway in Japan.
- Who
- A jiu-jitsu athlete, sporting authorities, and the Delhi High Court, with Justice Amit Mahajan hearing the case.
- What
- The court refused to direct authorities to send the athlete to compete in the Asian Games.
- Where
- The case was heard by the Delhi High Court, and the Games are being held in Aichi-Nagoya, Japan.
- When
- The athlete’s name was not submitted by the May 14 cutoff; the Games began on September 19 and are scheduled to end on October 4.
- Why
- The court said authorities had chosen not to send any jiu-jitsu athlete, the applicant’s name missed the cutoff, and courts cannot substitute sporting authorities’ decisions.
Athlete’s position
Court and sporting authorities’ position
Eligibility and participation
Athlete’s position
The athlete claimed he met the eligibility criteria but was not allowed to participate in the Asian Games.
Court and sporting authorities’ position
The authorities decided not to send any athlete for the jiu-jitsu event, and the court declined to intervene.
Court’s role
Athlete’s position
The athlete sought a court direction requiring authorities to send him to the Games.
Court and sporting authorities’ position
The court held that it cannot substitute the decision of a competent sporting authority on participation.
Timing of the request
Athlete’s position
The athlete pursued relief concerning the Games entry.
Court and sporting authorities’ position
The court noted that his name was not submitted by the May 14 cutoff and that the Games were already underway, leaving no effective relief available.
Key facts
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Judge
- Justice Amit Mahajan
- Sport
- Jiu-jitsu
- Event
- Asian Games
- Host location
- Aichi-Nagoya, Japan
- Entry cutoff
- May 14
- Event dates
- September 19 to October 4
Sources
Related news
Karnataka High Court Denies Surfer Ramesh Budihal Asian Games Relief
Telangana High Court Orders Review of Para Player’s Candidature
Anush Agarwalla Says Asian Games Exclusion Followed an Unfair Process
Supreme Court Clears Bilquis Mir for Asian Games Coaching
Delhi High Court Denies Phogat World Championships Trials Exemption
Visa Delays Affect Indian Athletes' Asian Games Prep
Asian Games, India-Japan Matches Fuel Sports Searches in India
India Rout Bangladesh 48-25 to Reach Asian Games Semifinals
Indian Table Tennis Pairs Reach Asian Games Quarter-Finals
Japan Reaffirms ICC Support as Trump Attacks Court at UN
