Archive · 8 Nov 2025

Supreme Court Delivers Split Verdict on SIT Composition for Akola Riots Probe

Supreme Court Delivers Split Verdict on SIT Composition for Akola Riots Probe

Imagine a fight happened between two groups of people in a city, and someone sadly died.

The country's highest court was asked to make sure the investigation into the fight was fair.

The court first suggested that the special police team investigating should have officers from both religious groups involved to ensure fairness.

The government then asked the court to rethink this, saying it's not right to assume police might be biased just based on religion.

Two judges on the court couldn't agree.

One judge felt it was important to have officers from both groups to make sure the investigation was open and honest, especially since the fight was between different religious communities.

The other judge thought the government's concerns were important enough to listen to more carefully.

Because they disagreed, the case will be reviewed further.

The original fight started after a social media post went viral.

Sources