Archive · 10 Sep 2026
Delhi High Court Orders CJP Leaders To Remove Bhatia Posts
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving posts about Gaurav Bhatia.
Bhatia is a leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party.
The court told CJP leaders to remove the posts.
The judge asked why CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke was included in the case.
The judge said there was no material against Dipke in the posts being challenged.
The court also told Bhatia that other ways of resolving the disagreement could have been tried first.
These methods are called alternative dispute resolution.
The report did not give the CJP leaders’ response.
The Delhi High Court directed CJP leaders to remove posts concerning BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia.
The court questioned why CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke was named in the suit.
The judge observed that there was no material against Dipke in the posts challenged by Bhatia.
The court advised Bhatia that alternative dispute resolution could have been considered.
The proceedings were reported by The Indian Express.
- Who
- BJP leader Gaurav Bhatia, CJP leaders, and CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke.
- What
- The Delhi High Court directed CJP leaders to remove posts concerning Bhatia and questioned Dipke’s inclusion in the suit.
- Where
- The Delhi High Court in Delhi.
- Why
- Bhatia objected to the posts; the court also considered whether alternative dispute resolution should have been pursued.
Bhatia’s legal objection
CJP leaders’ position
Removal of posts
Bhatia’s legal objection
Bhatia challenged posts concerning him and sought court intervention.
CJP leaders’ position
The court directed CJP leaders to remove the posts; the report does not state their response.
Role of Abhijeet Dipke
Bhatia’s legal objection
Dipke was named in the suit brought by Bhatia.
CJP leaders’ position
The court questioned his inclusion, saying there was no material against him in the posts challenged by Bhatia.
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Person at issue
- Gaurav Bhatia
- Organization mentioned
- Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
- CJP founder
- Abhijeet Dipke
- Court direction
- CJP leaders were directed to remove the posts.
- Court observation
- The court said there was no material against Dipke in the objected-to posts.
- Suggested alternative
- Alternative dispute resolution methods could have been considered.