Archive · 22 Jul 2026
Calcutta High Court Jails Father for 2006 Murder
The Calcutta High Court recently overturned the acquittal of a man and his four relatives who were accused of murdering his wife in 2006.
The court found the testimony of the couple's minor son, who witnessed the crime, to be credible.
The child had hidden under a bed and was terrified during the incident.
The court noted that witnessing such an event is abnormal and that the child had no motive to falsely implicate his father or relatives.
The high court sentenced the husband and the other accused to life imprisonment with a minimum of 24 years before remission and imposed fines.
The prosecution claimed that the husband assaulted and poisoned his wife with the help of his relatives.
The defense argued that the child's testimony was unreliable and that the demand for dowry was not proven.
The court found the husband's actions and the roles of the other accused in assaulting the victim and wiping out evidence to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
The Calcutta High Court overturned the acquittal of a man and four relatives for the murder of his wife in 2006.
The court found the testimony of the couple's minor son, who witnessed the crime, to be credible.
The child had hidden under a bed and was terrified during the incident.
The court sentenced the husband and the other accused to life imprisonment with a minimum of 24 years before remission and imposed fines.
The prosecution claimed that the husband assaulted and poisoned his wife with the help of his relatives.
- Who
- A man and four of his relatives
- What
- Murder of the man's wife
- When
- June 6, 2006
- Where
- Matrimonial house of the victim
- Why
- The husband demanded dowry and assaulted his wife, leading to her death.
Prosecution
Defense
Child's Testimony
Prosecution
The child's testimony is credible and should not be brushed aside.
Defense
The child's testimony is unreliable and should not be the sole basis for conviction.
Evidence of Dowry Demand
Prosecution
The demand for dowry by the accused husband was established.
Defense
The demand for dowry was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Date of Incident
- June 6, 2006
- Date of Acquittal
- March 30, 2017
- Date of High Court Order
- July 16
- Sentence
- Life imprisonment with a minimum of 24 years before remission
- Fine
- Rs 15,000 each for the accused, Rs 25,000 for the husband