19 hrs ago

Texas Lawyer’s Courtroom Outfit Criticism Sparks Online Debate

Texas Lawyer’s Courtroom Outfit Criticism Sparks Online Debate
US Lawyer Alleges Judge Called Her Courtroom Attire 'Inappropriate', Internet Divided · NDTV

Mariah Medina is a lawyer in Texas who said a judge criticized her clothes in court.

She was wearing a knee-length, sleeveless gray dress.

Medina said the judge questioned whether the dress was suitable for a jury trial.

She also said the judge asked her to walk around the bench so the outfit could be inspected.

Medina believed the dress followed the courthouse’s general business-attire rules.

She posted a video showing that she had worn the same dress while working on television.

Her story spread online and people disagreed about what happened.

Some thought the judge embarrassed her, while others said judges can require formal clothing in their courtrooms.

Key facts

Lawyer
Mariah Medina
Occupation
Criminal defense lawyer and former television news journalist
Outfit
A knee-length, sleeveless gray J.Crew shift dress
Location
Bexar County Government building, San Antonio, Texas
Reported courthouse rule
Standard business attire, with variations left to individual judicial discretion
Public reaction
Social media users disagreed over courtroom standards and the judge’s handling of the interaction

Quotes

Mariah Medina

Texas criminal defense lawyer and former television news journalist

“This is what I was wearing today when a judge said that I was inappropriately dressed for court. It's a dress I've worn on air countless times and a dress that I have worn to other courts without issue. I was confused, so I explained that it's a shift dress.”
NDTV
“She had me come around the bench so she could see my outfit... in front of defendants and other lawyers. She laughed and asked if I really believed that my dress was appropriate for a jury trial... then asked me if I had a blazer in my car.”
NDTV

A social media commenter

Retired lawyer commenting on Medina’s account

“Retired lawyer. 42 years. Over 100 jury trials in state and federal courts. Dozens of oral arguments in state appellate courts and the 9th Circuit. The dress is fine. The judge was being petty. Publicly shaming you was way out of line.”
NDTV

Sources

Related news