Archive · 8 Sep 2026
ISRO, IN-SPACe Clash Over Transfer of Mature Rocket Technologies
Some former space officials and ISRO employee groups are questioning plans to let private companies make India’s established rockets.
They want to know which government decision allows this process.
The dispute involves IN-SPACe, ISRO and NSIL, which have different responsibilities in the space sector.
IN-SPACe says it can help private companies participate in space activities.
ISRO says private companies can produce mature technologies while ISRO works on harder future missions.
ISRO also says it will not be privatised or weakened.
Critics believe IN-SPACe may have gone beyond its authorised role by inviting EOIs for rocket technologies and a spaceport.
ISRO says important infrastructure and strategic capabilities will remain under government control.
The central unanswered question is whether the EOI invitations were based on an approved government policy.
Nine ISRO employee associations asked for written clarification on plans to transfer rocket technologies and facilities to private companies.
Former space secretaries questioned IN-SPACe’s authority to invite EOIs for PSLV, LVM3 and a Tamil Nadu spaceport.
ISRO said it will retain responsibility for advanced research, national missions and strategic capabilities, while industry scales mature technologies.
IN-SPACe said it will authorise private participation, while NSIL will commercialise mature space capabilities.
Critics said ISRO and IN-SPACe have not identified the government policy decision authorising the EOI process.
- Who
- ISRO, IN-SPACe, NSIL, nine ISRO employee associations, and former Department of Space secretaries including G Madhavan Nair.
- What
- A dispute over IN-SPACe’s invitation of Expressions of Interest for ISRO’s mature rocket technologies and a planned Tamil Nadu spaceport.
- When
- The dispute was reported alongside ISRO’s September 4, 2026 GSLV-F17/EOS-05 launch reference; the article does not give a date for the EOI invitations.
- Where
- India, including ISRO facilities and the upcoming spaceport in Tamil Nadu.
- Why
- Critics want to know the government authority and policy basis for transferring publicly developed technologies and facilities to private operators.
Critics of the EOI process
ISRO and IN-SPACe
Authority to invite EOIs
Critics of the EOI process
Former space secretaries and employee associations say IN-SPACe may have exceeded its brief because technology transfer belongs to NSIL, while IN-SPACe should authorise private-sector participation.
ISRO and IN-SPACe
IN-SPACe says it will facilitate and authorise non-government participation, while ISRO says reforms allow industry to scale mature technologies.
Future role of ISRO
Critics of the EOI process
Employee associations seek clarification on whether ISRO will continue designing, developing, testing and launching vehicles such as PSLV, LVM3 and SSLV.
ISRO and IN-SPACe
ISRO says it will remain the core organisation for advanced research, technology development, strategic missions, science and exploration, while focusing on next-generation capabilities.
Control of public assets
Critics of the EOI process
Critics question the transfer or opening of publicly funded technologies, test facilities, launch complexes and know-how to private operation.
ISRO and IN-SPACe
ISRO says ownership and control of critical national infrastructure and strategic capabilities will remain with the government, subject to security and safety requirements.
- Organisations involved
- ISRO, IN-SPACe and NewSpace India Limited (NSIL)
- Technologies named
- Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV), Launch Vehicle Mark-3 (LVM3) and Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV)
- Critics
- Former space secretaries and nine ISRO employee associations
- IN-SPACe position
- It will facilitate and authorise greater non-government participation
- ISRO position
- ISRO will remain responsible for advanced research, national missions and strategic capabilities
- Commercialisation role
- NSIL is described as responsible for commercialising mature capabilities
- Unanswered issue
- Whether a government, Space Commission or Department of Space decision authorised the EOI invitations