Archive · 18 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court frees 2006 kidnap-murder convict on reformation grounds
A man did a very bad thing many years ago — in 2006, he helped kidnap and hurt a law student named Mandar in Goa.
He was sentenced to life in prison.
While in jail, the man decided to change his life.
He took college courses through a university called IGNOU and earned three degrees.
He also worked in the prison, helping run the canteen and the bakery.
After he had been in prison for more than 14 years, a special board said he could be released early because he had become a better person.
But the government of Goa said no, because the crime was very serious and people were worried about safety.
A big court called the Bombay High Court said the government was not being fair.
The judges explained that prison is not only for punishment — it is also for helping people improve and return to society.
So the court decided that the man should be set free.
The Bombay High Court ordered the early release of a man convicted for the 2006 kidnapping and murder of law student Mandar Surlakar in Goa.
The court held that the heinousness of the original offence alone cannot justify denying remission, citing the reformative purpose of punishment.
While in prison, the convict completed three courses through IGNOU and handled responsibilities such as managing the canteen and bakery sections.
The State Sentence Review Board recommended his release in 2025, but the Goa government rejected it on January 1, 2026 citing the nature of the crime and public-safety concerns.
The court quashed the rejection as arbitrary, noting a low likelihood of reoffending and satisfactory conduct during parole.
- Who
- A 41-year-old man convicted with three others for the 2006 kidnap-murder of law student Mandar Surlakar; the case was decided by a Bombay High Court bench of Justices Neela Gokhale and Amit S Jamsandekar.
- What
- The Bombay High Court quashed the Goa government's rejection of the State Sentence Review Board's recommendation and ordered the convict's early release on reformative grounds.
- When
- The court order was dated August 6; the crime occurred in 2006, the conviction in 2014, and the government's rejection came on January 1, 2026.
- Where
- The crime took place in Goa and the matter was heard by the Bombay High Court.
- Why
- The court held that punishment must serve a reformative purpose, and the convict's education, prison work, conduct and parole record showed rehabilitation and a low likelihood of reoffending.
Reformative justice
Public safety and punishment
Premature release after 14 years
Reformative justice
The convict served the required 14 years, completed three IGNOU courses and showed clear rehabilitation, so early release is justified and continued incarceration is not fruitful.
Public safety and punishment
The Goa government argued that premature release is an executive discretion and that the heinous, pre-planned crime devastated the victim's family, so the convict should remain in prison.
Risk of reoffending and public safety
Reformative justice
The district magistrate and Inspector General of Prisons reported satisfactory conduct and no adverse reports during parole, indicating a low likelihood of reoffending.
Public safety and punishment
The superintendent of police objected that releasing the man early was not in the interest of justice or public safety.
- Court
- Bombay High Court (Justices Neela Gokhale and Amit S Jamsandekar)
- Crime
- Kidnapping and murder of law student Mandar Surlakar in Goa in 2006
- Ransom demanded
- Rs 50 lakh
- Conviction
- 2014, life imprisonment
- Time served
- Over 20 years in total, including 14 years of actual imprisonment
- IGNOU courses completed
- Bachelor's in Tourism Studies, Post Graduation in Tourism and Travel Management, Diploma in Finance and Accounting
- SSRB recommendation
- Recommended early release in 2025 based on rehabilitation, education and prison conduct
- State rejection
- January 1, 2026, citing the nature of the crime and public-safety concerns