Archive · 23 Aug 2026
Experts Split Over Whether NTA Should Be Reformed or Scrapped
The National Testing Agency, or NTA, conducts many important exams in India.
It has faced criticism after problems involving NEET UG and the cancellation of part of the UGC NET exam.
Some experts think the agency should be improved rather than closed.
Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar says exams need better security checks and digital tracking.
He also says fewer people should handle secret exam materials.
Surajit Mazumdar believes NTA has too much work and not enough administrative strength.
He says outsourcing many tasks can make paper leaks more likely.
Neha Bora wants NTA replaced by public agencies working in a more decentralised and accountable system.
The main disagreement is whether NTA can be fixed or should be abolished.
The National Testing Agency faces scrutiny after the NEET UG paper-leak controversy and UGC NET cancellation for three subjects.
Former UGC chairman Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar supports strengthening NTA through risk assessments, digital traceability and independent checks.
Jawaharlal Nehru University professor Surajit Mazumdar argues NTA is structurally weak because its broad workload encourages outsourcing and increases leak risks.
All India Students' Association president Neha Bora calls for abolishing NTA and creating accountable, decentralised public agencies.
The experts differ on the solution, but all identify weaknesses in examination security, administration or accountability.
- Who
- The National Testing Agency, former UGC chairman Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar, JNU professor Surajit Mazumdar and AISA president Neha Bora.
- What
- Experts debated whether the National Testing Agency should be structurally reformed or scrapped after controversies involving NEET UG and UGC NET.
- When
- During the controversy following the NEET UG paper-leak row and the cancellation of the UGC NET exam for three subjects.
- Where
- India, in the context of national-level higher-education entrance and eligibility examinations.
- Why
- Concerns were raised about examination security, outsourcing, administrative capacity, accountability and the risks of concentrating many exams in one agency.
Reform NTA
Scrap NTA
Whether the agency can be fixed
Reform NTA
Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar says the core problem is end-to-end examination security and that structural strengthening can make breaches harder; he does not support scrapping NTA merely to reduce its workload.
Scrap NTA
Surajit Mazumdar and Neha Bora argue that NTA is structurally weak, overextended and dependent on outsourcing, making abolition and replacement a better solution.
Centralisation versus decentralisation
Reform NTA
Kumar says dividing exams among multiple agencies would not necessarily solve the problem because exam complexity, rather than the number of exams, is the main issue.
Scrap NTA
Mazumdar says centralising all examinations does not make sense for a vast and diverse country, while Bora advocates a decentralised federal system.
Role of outsourcing
Reform NTA
The reform position focuses on tighter controls, fewer handlers of confidential materials, digital traceability and independent checks at every stage.
Scrap NTA
Bora identifies extensive outsourcing as a major weakness, and Mazumdar says outsourcing creates greater risks of paper leaks.
- Agency mandate
- The National Testing Agency was envisaged in November 2017 as a single agency for conducting higher-education entrance examinations.
- Recent scrutiny
- NTA came under scrutiny after the NEET UG paper-leak row and cancellation of the UGC NET exam for three subjects.
- Reform proposal
- Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar proposed continuous risk assessment, fewer handlers of confidential material, digital traceability and independent checks.
- Structural criticism
- Surajit Mazumdar said NTA has limited administrative capacity and must outsource many activities.
- Staffing concern
- Neha Bora said NTA has fewer than 25 employees while conducting about 30 national-level exams annually.
- Alternative model
- Neha Bora recommended replacing NTA with accountable, transparent and decentralised public agencies.