Archive · 28 Aug 2026
Rajasthan Lawyers Demand Action Over Acting Chief Justice Allegations
Three groups of lawyers in Rajasthan are worried about allegations involving the acting head of the Rajasthan High Court.
A Supreme Court judge has asked that the acting Chief Justice be moved and that a new Chief Justice be appointed.
The allegations include claims that judicial powers may have been misused, but the article does not say that these claims have been proven.
The lawyers said the matter could affect trust in the courts.
They want the judiciary to investigate and take necessary action.
They will meet again soon to decide what to do next.
Jodhpur lawyers are also concerned that too few judges are permanently sitting there.
They have asked for more judges at Jodhpur and for two recent postings to Jaipur to be reconsidered.
Three Rajasthan lawyer associations expressed serious concern over allegations against Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma.
Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant seeking Sharma’s transfer and a new Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice.
The associations condemned any alleged misuse of judicial office and called for institutional action prioritising dignity, independence and transparency.
The three associations will hold a joint meeting within two days to discuss the allegations and decide their next steps.
Jodhpur lawyers also urged Sharma to reconsider judge assignments and increase permanent judicial strength at the principal seat.
- Who
- The three Rajasthan lawyer associations, Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta and Chief Justice of India Surya Kant.
- What
- Lawyer associations expressed concern over allegations against Sharma and separately requested changes to judicial postings and increased judge strength at Jodhpur.
- When
- The associations held an emergency meeting on Thursday; Justice Mehta wrote three letters earlier this month, and a joint lawyers’ meeting is planned within two days.
- Where
- The matter concerns the Rajasthan High Court, including its Jaipur Bench and principal seat at Jodhpur.
- Why
- The lawyers cited concerns about alleged misuse of position, institutional dignity, judicial independence, transparency, pendency and the balance of judicial strength between Jodhpur and Jaipur.
Calls for Investigation and Administrative Change
Judicial Authority and Reported Response
Alleged misuse of position
Calls for Investigation and Administrative Change
Justice Sandeep Mehta cited complaints and said they raised doubts about the Acting Chief Justice’s integrity; the lawyer associations called for the matter to receive the utmost seriousness.
Judicial Authority and Reported Response
The article reports no response from Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and does not establish that the allegations have been proven.
Judge deployment between Jodhpur and Jaipur
Calls for Investigation and Administrative Change
The Jodhpur associations say the principal seat faces substantial pendency and that permanent judicial strength at Jodhpur should be increased.
Judicial Authority and Reported Response
The associations acknowledge that rosters, sitting arrangements and deployment of judges fall within the administrative authority of the Chief Justice.
- Acting Chief Justice
- Sanjeev Prakash Sharma of the Rajasthan High Court
- Supreme Court letters
- Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote three letters to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant earlier this month.
- Requests in the letters
- Mehta sought Sharma’s transfer to another High Court and appointment of a new Chief Justice for Rajasthan.
- Lawyer associations
- The Rajasthan High Court Bar Association, Jaipur; the Rajasthan High Court Lawyers’ Association, Jodhpur; and the Rajasthan High Court Advocates’ Association, Jodhpur.
- Next step
- Officials from all three associations plan to meet jointly within two days to discuss the facts and decide their strategy.
- Jodhpur requests
- The two Jodhpur associations requested reconsideration of judge postings, restoration of the customary balance between Jodhpur and Jaipur, and increased judicial strength at Jodhpur.