Archive · 11 Sep 2026
Twenty-Five Years After 9/11, Muslims Face Blame and Defensiveness
The writer remembers seeing the September 11 attacks when she was young.
At first, she did not feel that the attack described her identity as an Indian Muslim.
Over time, some people began treating Muslims everywhere as if they were responsible for terrorism.
The writer says this is unfair because Muslims are not all the same.
She also believes some Muslim communities avoid asking hard questions about extremism.
Some young Muslims have been persuaded to commit violent crimes using religious language.
Saying that terrorism does not represent Islam is important, but the writer says people should also ask how radicalisation happens.
She believes different interpretations and disagreements about religion should be allowed.
Her main message is that neither blaming all Muslims nor refusing honest self-examination will solve the problem.
The writer recalls watching 9/11 as a teenager and initially seeing it as distant from her Indian Muslim identity.
She says Indian Muslims often navigate stereotypes involving religion, Pakistan, and socioeconomic conditions, while sharing everyday life with other communities.
After 9/11, terrorism increasingly prompted questions about whether violence was political, religious, ideological, or a combination.
She criticizes both social-media figures who generalize about Muslims and community voices that reject difficult discussions about extremism.
The writer argues that rejecting collective blame should coexist with introspection, open debate, and opposition to extremist interpretations of Islam.
- Who
- Amana Begam Ansari, writing as an Indian Muslim, reflects on Muslims, terrorism, and debates about Islam after 9/11.
- What
- A personal commentary argues against collective blame of Muslims while calling for greater introspection about extremism and religious interpretation.
- When
- On the 25th anniversary of 9/11.
- Where
- The reflection focuses on India and the wider global discussion shaped by 9/11.
- Why
- The writer says terrorism led to increased suspicion of Muslims while some community leaders and members resisted difficult conversations about radicalisation and accountability.
Reject Collective Blame
Demand Internal Introspection
How Muslims are viewed
Reject Collective Blame
Muslims should not be treated as a single threatening group because of terrorist acts committed by extremists.
Demand Internal Introspection
Rejecting collective blame should not prevent discussion of ideas, interpretations, or community conditions that extremists may exploit.
Response after attacks
Reject Collective Blame
It is valid to say that terrorism does not represent Islam and to address the victimisation ordinary Muslims experience afterward.
Demand Internal Introspection
Community responses should also focus first on the people killed and ask how young Muslims became radicalised.
Religious disagreement
Reject Collective Blame
People should be free to interpret Islam differently or not follow a particular interpretation.
Demand Internal Introspection
Open debate requires acknowledging that extremist movements construct interpretations of religious texts and history, rather than refusing difficult questions.
- Anniversary
- The commentary marks 25 years since 9/11.
- Author
- Amana Begam Ansari, a columnist, writer, and television news panellist.
- Identity
- The author describes herself as an Indian Muslim.
- Early response
- She initially viewed the Taliban and Al-Qaeda as distant from her everyday identity and life.
- Central criticism
- She rejects treating Muslims collectively as a threat.
- Community concern
- She argues that some Muslim voices respond defensively instead of examining radicalisation and competing interpretations of Islam.
- Proposed approach
- She supports open disagreement, contextual interpretation, and introspection alongside rejecting dehumanisation.