Archive · 29 Jan 2026
Telangana High Court Bars Forest Officials from Investigating IPC Offences
The Telangana High Court has said that forest officials cannot investigate crimes under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
This decision came after a group of people were accused of entering a protected area and hurting a forest worker.
The court said that only the police can investigate IPC crimes, even if they happen along with wildlife crimes.
The court allowed the investigation of wildlife crimes to continue but stopped the forest officials from investigating the IPC crimes.
This means forest officials can only investigate crimes related to wildlife, not other types of crimes.
Telangana High Court ruled that forest officials cannot investigate IPC offences.
The court quashed the investigation into IPC Sections 351, 332, and 333.
The case involved allegations of illegal entry into the Amrabad Tiger Reserve and assault on a forest protection watcher.
Forest officials can only investigate offences under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
The court allowed the investigation of wildlife offences under Sections 27 and 56 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act to continue.
- Who
- Justice J. Srinivas Rao of the Telangana High Court
- What
- Ruled that forest officials cannot investigate Indian Penal Code (IPC) offences
- When
- During a hearing of a petition filed by K. Sai Rohit and five others
- Where
- Telangana High Court, Hyderabad
- Why
- To clarify the jurisdiction of forest officials under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
- Court
- Telangana High Court
- Judge
- Justice J. Srinivas Rao
- Petitioners
- K. Sai Rohit and five others
- Alleged Incident Date
- March 27, 2022
- Location
- Amrabad Tiger Reserve, Telangana
- IPC Sections Quashed
- 351, 332, 333
- Wildlife Act Sections
- 27, 56