Archive · 20 Jul 2026
Source Code Ownership Critical for Startups in Tech Contracts
Two companies, one from Florida and one from Delhi, had a disagreement about who owns the computer code for a project they worked on together.
The Florida company, I-Chrono, paid the Delhi company, Fluper, to create a special app and website for selling luxury watches.
They also wanted an AI feature to check if the watches were real.
I-Chrono says they didn't get the computer code they paid for, even after asking many times.
They also say the AI part didn't work well.
Now, they are in a legal fight to get the code.
This story shows why it's important for companies to have clear rules about who owns the computer code when they work together on projects.
I-Chrono LLC engaged Fluper Limited in January 2025 to develop a mobile app and web platform for an online luxury watch marketplace.
Subsequent engagement for an AI-based luxury watch authentication feature was also undertaken.
I-Chrono alleges that despite payments, the agreed source code and project materials were not delivered.
The dispute has led to legal action, with interim directions passed for the preservation of the disputed source code.
The matter highlights the importance of clearly defining source code ownership and delivery obligations in technology contracts.
- Who
- I-Chrono LLC (Florida-based technology company) and Fluper Limited (Delhi-based software development company)
- What
- Dispute over source code delivery and project materials under software development agreements
- When
- Engagement began in January 2025, current status of the matter not specified
- Where
- Cross-border dispute involving companies based in Florida, USA, and Delhi, India
- Why
- Importance of clearly defining source code ownership and delivery obligations in technology contracts
I-Chrono LLC
Fluper Limited
Source Code Delivery
I-Chrono LLC
I-Chrono claims source code and project materials were not delivered despite payments and repeated requests.
Fluper Limited
Fluper's stance on the matter is not explicitly stated in the article.
Project Performance
I-Chrono LLC
I-Chrono alleges the AI functionality did not perform as expected during testing and required multiple revisions.
Fluper Limited
Fluper's response to these allegations is not detailed in the article.
- Companies Involved
- I-Chrono LLC (Florida) and Fluper Limited (Delhi)
- Project Details
- Development of a mobile application and web platform for an online luxury watch marketplace, and an AI-based luxury watch authentication feature
- Contractual Issues
- Dispute over source code delivery and project materials
- Legal Representation
- I-Chrono represented by King Stubb & Kasiva (KSK)
- Current Status
- Matter under consideration, interim directions passed for preservation of source code and records