Archive · 29 Sep 2026
Saurabh Rajput Murder Case Verdict Set for September 30
A court in Meerut is about to decide a murder case involving Saurabh Rajput.
His wife, Muskan Rastogi, and Sahil Shukla are accused of killing him and hiding evidence.
Police say the alleged killing happened in March 2025.
They allege that Rajput’s body was cut up and placed in a blue drum filled with cement.
Investigators filed a chargesheet of almost 1,000 pages.
The court heard testimony from 22 witnesses over about 126 hearings.
The prosecution presented medical, forensic, physical and digital evidence.
The defence said there was no eyewitness and questioned whether the evidence proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The verdict is scheduled for September 30.
Muskan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla are on trial for Rajput’s alleged murder and destruction of evidence.
Police allege Rajput was killed in March 2025 and his body was dismembered and concealed in a cement-filled blue drum.
The prosecution filed a nearly 1,000-page chargesheet containing alleged conspiracy details and investigative evidence.
Twenty-two witnesses testified during approximately 126 hearings, including medical, forensic, police and other witnesses.
The Meerut district court will assess the circumstantial, forensic and digital evidence before delivering its verdict.
- Who
- Muskan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla are facing trial in connection with Saurabh Rajput’s alleged murder and destruction of evidence.
- What
- The Meerut district court is set to deliver its verdict after a trial involving allegations of murder, dismemberment and concealment of Rajput’s body.
- When
- Police allege the killing occurred in March 2025; the verdict is scheduled for September 30.
- Where
- The case is being heard by the Meerut district court, concerning events investigated in Meerut’s Indiranagar area.
- Why
- The court will determine whether the prosecution proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Prosecution’s Case
Defence’s Case
Strength of evidence
Prosecution’s Case
The prosecution argues that witness testimony and medical, forensic, physical and digital evidence establish the sequence linking the accused to the killing, disposal of the body and their subsequent movements.
Defence’s Case
The defence argues that the circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Eyewitness testimony
Prosecution’s Case
The prosecution relies substantially on circumstantial evidence and testimony from police, forensic, medical and other witnesses.
Defence’s Case
Defence lawyers highlighted that there was no eyewitness to the alleged murder.
Alleged planning
Prosecution’s Case
Police described the killing as a well-thought-out conspiracy and presented evidence concerning the alleged purchase of the drum and other materials, as well as travel and telecommunications records.
Defence’s Case
The defence contests the prosecution’s allegations and says the court must scrutinize whether the evidence is legally sufficient.
- Accused
- Muskan Rastogi and Sahil Shukla
- Alleged crime
- Murder and destruction of evidence
- Alleged date
- March 2025
- Chargesheet
- Nearly 1,000 pages, filed in May 2025
- Witnesses examined
- 22 during the trial
- Hearings
- Approximately 126
- Verdict
- Scheduled for September 30
- Evidence
- Medical, forensic, physical, digital and circumstantial evidence