Archive · 12 Sep 2026
Researcher Claims Great Pyramid Holds Hidden Astronomical Mathematical Code
A researcher says the Great Pyramid may contain a hidden mathematical code.
He studied its height, base and sloping sides using fractions connected to ancient Egyptian mathematics.
He says one calculation produced 27.5, a number close to the Moon’s 27.55-day cycle between closest approaches to Earth.
Another calculation produced 70, which he connects to the time Sirius is hidden by sunlight.
He also sees possible links to planets, pi and the golden ratio.
The researcher compared the results with 100,000 computer-made pyramid models.
About 2.4 percent of those models showed similar patterns.
He thinks this could suggest careful design, but it does not prove the Egyptians intended to create a code.
The research has not been peer-reviewed or accepted as established archaeological evidence.
Independent researcher Sefy Levy says the Great Pyramid’s dimensions contain mathematical and astronomical patterns.
Levy links calculated values including 27.5 and 70 to lunar and stellar cycles.
He also proposes connections to Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Mars, pi and the golden ratio.
A comparison with 100,000 computer-generated pyramids found similar patterns in about 2.4 percent of models.
The theory is based on an unreviewed SSRN paper and remains unverified by mainstream Egyptologists.
- Who
- Independent researcher Sefy Levy proposed the theory; mainstream Egyptologists have not verified it.
- What
- A theory claims that the Great Pyramid’s dimensions encode mathematical and astronomical information.
- When
- The Great Pyramid was built nearly 4,500 years ago during Pharaoh Khufu’s reign; the theory is based on a recently published SSRN paper.
- Where
- The Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt.
- Why
- Levy argues that the pyramid may have preserved ancient knowledge rather than serving only as a tomb; this interpretation remains unproven.
Levy’s Interpretation
Mainstream Caution
Meaning of the measurements
Levy’s Interpretation
Levy says the pyramid’s dimensions produce numbers corresponding to lunar, stellar and planetary cycles, as well as constants such as pi and the golden ratio.
Mainstream Caution
There is no independent evidence showing that the dimensions were deliberately designed to encode this information.
Intentional design
Levy’s Interpretation
Levy argues that similar patterns appearing in only about 2.4 percent of 100,000 computer-generated models may suggest deliberate design.
Mainstream Caution
The computer comparison does not prove that ancient Egyptians created a mathematical or astronomical code.
Purpose of the pyramid
Levy’s Interpretation
Levy proposes that the structure may have been a permanent record of ancient knowledge and may have been associated with Benben, the primordial mound in Egyptian creation mythology.
Mainstream Caution
The Great Pyramid is traditionally understood as part of Pharaoh Khufu’s funerary complex, while the alternative interpretation remains unproven.
- Researcher
- Sefy Levy
- Monument
- The Great Pyramid of Giza
- Proposed lunar link
- The calculated value 27.5, compared by Levy with the 27.55-day interval between successive lunar perigees
- Proposed Sirius link
- The calculated value 70, linked by Levy to Sirius’s approximate 70-day period of invisibility caused by sunlight
- Computer comparison
- 100,000 computer-generated pyramid models
- Similar patterns
- About 2.4 percent of the models showed similar patterns
- Evidence status
- The paper has not been peer-reviewed, and mainstream Egyptologists have not established the claims as archaeological evidence
