Archive · 1 Sep 2026
Bombay High Court Upholds Life Term in Wife’s Murder
A court in Bombay upheld a man’s life sentence for killing his wife.
The incident happened in May 2016.
The injured woman told several people that her husband had stabbed her.
She died in hospital the next day.
Their young son also told the court that he saw his father attack his mother.
The man’s lawyer said there was no trustworthy eyewitness and questioned the knife evidence.
Prosecutors said the case had been proved properly.
The judges decided the woman’s statements and the son’s testimony were believable.
The Bombay High Court upheld a 52-year-old man’s life sentence for murdering his wife in 2016.
The court relied on the woman’s consistent oral dying declarations naming her husband as the attacker.
The couple’s young son testified that his father stabbed his mother in the stomach and back with a knife.
The defense argued there was no reliable eyewitness and that the knife evidence was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.
The court found the declarations voluntary, consistent and not the result of tutoring, and upheld the conviction.
- Who
- The Bombay High Court, a 52-year-old convicted man, his deceased wife and their son were central to the case.
- What
- The court upheld the man’s life sentence for murdering his wife and rejected his appeal.
- When
- The stabbing occurred on May 4, 2016; the woman died the next day, and the High Court order was dated August 28.
- Where
- The attack occurred at the couple’s matrimonial home, followed by treatment at a hospital; the appeal was heard by the Bombay High Court.
- Why
- The court found the woman’s oral dying declarations and the son’s testimony credible, consistent and free from evidence of tutoring.
Defense View
Prosecution and Court View
Eyewitness evidence
Defense View
The defense argued that there was no eyewitness to the incident apart from the minor son and questioned the reliability of the evidence.
Prosecution and Court View
The prosecution relied on the son’s testimony, while the court said he clearly and unequivocally identified his father as the attacker.
Dying declarations
Defense View
The defense claimed the wife’s statement to her brother in the ambulance was unreliable and should not be considered.
Prosecution and Court View
The prosecution and court said the woman consistently named her husband to three witnesses, and the court found the statements voluntary, coherent and not tutored.
Knife evidence
Defense View
The defense argued that use of the alleged knife was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Prosecution and Court View
The prosecution said the claim that the seized knife was not sent for forensic examination was incorrect, and the court relied on the son’s identification of the weapon.
- Conviction
- Life imprisonment under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code
- Trial-court order
- The conviction was issued in August 2018.
- Incident date
- May 4, 2016
- Victim’s death
- The woman died in hospital the day after the attack.
- Fine
- The man was fined Rs 50,000.
- Payment to sons
- The trial court ordered Rs 40,000 to be paid to the couple’s sons after the appeal period.
- Key evidence
- Oral dying declarations to three witnesses and testimony from the couple’s young son