Archive · 5 Nov 2025
India's Think Tanks Face Scrutiny Over Lack of Disclosure and Policy Influence
Imagine some smart people who write reports to help leaders make important decisions for the country.
But sometimes, these reports might not be completely honest.
They might be paid for by companies who want the leaders to make decisions that help those companies, not necessarily everyone.
These reports might not use good ways to gather information, like asking the right people or looking at all the facts.
This can lead to bad rules that don't help people as much as they should.
For India to become a strong country, the advice given to leaders needs to be trustworthy.
So, it's important that these smart people clearly say who paid for their reports and how they got their information.
This way, leaders can make the best decisions for everyone.
Leaders and news reporters often use these reports, so it's crucial they are reliable.
India has over 600 think tanks, many focused on economic policy, operating in a largely unregulated space.
Concerns exist regarding a lack of transparency, methodological soundness, and disclosure of funding and affiliations in think tank research.
Sponsored studies by industry groups may use flawed data and biased methods to influence policy decisions.
The debate around the Draft Digital Competition Bill highlights issues with unrepresentative samples, opaque survey designs, and cherry-picked evidence.
Recommendations include mandatory disclosure of funding sources, methodological transparency, and engagement with diverse viewpoints to restore trust in evidence-based policymaking.
- Who
- Think tanks, policymakers, industry groups, consumers, MSMEs
- What
- Concerns about a lack of transparency, methodological rigor, and disclosure of funding and affiliations among India's think tanks, potentially leading to flawed policymaking and lobbying under the guise of research.
- When
- Ongoing, with specific reference to the Draft Digital Competition Bill debate and proposed reforms for India's vision of Viksit Bharat 2047.
- Where
- India
- Why
- To ensure that policymaking is evidence-based, serves the public interest, and is not unduly influenced by vested interests or flawed research.
Think Tanks Urge Transparency and Rigor
Industry and Vested Interests
Methodological Soundness and Transparency
Think Tanks Urge Transparency and Rigor
Advocates for clear standards in survey design, sampling procedures, and data cleaning, with full disclosure of funding sources and affiliations to ensure evidence-based policymaking.
Industry and Vested Interests
Reports sometimes rely on unrepresentative samples, biased questions, or cherry-picked evidence, with funding sources obscured or buried, leading to flawed policy recommendations.
Influence on Policymaking
Think Tanks Urge Transparency and Rigor
Emphasizes that lobbying disguised as policy work distorts the regulatory process and harms public interests, particularly for consumers and MSMEs.
Industry and Vested Interests
Industry-sponsored studies may be used to promote specific policy positions, potentially influencing legislation to benefit corporate sponsors.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Think Tanks Urge Transparency and Rigor
Calls for mandatory disclosure of external funding, affiliations, and potential conflicts of interest for all public-facing research and contributors to policy debates.
Industry and Vested Interests
Some reports lack clarity on authorship and funding, with potential conflicts of interest not disclosed, creating an illusion of academic consensus.
- Number of Think Tanks in India (2020)
- Over 600
- Technology Firm Lobbying in EU
- €151 million per year
- Draft Digital Competition Bill
- Published March 12, 2024
- Focus of Think Tanks
- Economic policy, digital reforms
- Concerns Raised
- Lack of transparency, methodological flaws, undisclosed funding, biased influence on policymaking