Archive · 19 Sep 2026
How Opposition Disunity Shaped the DUSU Election Result
The DUSU election led to an argument about whether opposition groups worked together effectively.
Saurav Das of the CJP criticised these groups in a post on X. He said they should improve their own plans instead of repeatedly attacking the CJP.
Das pointed to Deepanshu Shokeen’s victory in the vice-president election.
Shokeen won by a very large margin even though he had not received the NSUI party ticket.
Das said some Left groups cared too much about ideological purity and excluding others.
He argued that voters were not waiting for the opposition’s approval.
His message was that divided opposition groups may continue losing political contests.
CJP’s Saurav Das criticised the opposition’s handling of the DUSU election results.
Das said opposition groups should fix their strategy instead of targeting the CJP.
Rebel NSUI candidate Deepanshu Shokeen won the vice-president post by a “HUGE margin.”
Shokeen had been denied the NSUI ticket before running as a rebel candidate.
Das blamed ideological purity and exclusivity for weakening opposition unity.
- Who
- CJP’s Saurav Das, rebel NSUI candidate Deepanshu Shokeen, and opposition and Left groups involved in the DUSU election.
- What
- A debate over opposition disunity after Deepanshu Shokeen won the DUSU vice-president election despite being denied the NSUI ticket.
- When
- The timing is not specified; the comments followed the DUSU election results.
- Where
- The DUSU election; a specific location is not stated in the article.
- Why
- Das argued that opposition groups’ lack of coordination, ideological exclusivity, and focus on attacking the CJP weakened their performance.
- Election
- DUSU election
- Contested post
- Vice-president
- Winner
- Deepanshu Shokeen
- Candidate status
- Rebel candidate denied the NSUI ticket
- Reported margin
- A “HUGE margin,” according to Saurav Das
- Source of criticism
- A post on X by CJP’s Saurav Das
- Main criticism
- Opposition groups were accused of prioritising ideological purity and exclusivity over unity